GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed?

submitted by SnowAssMan from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]one1won 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No.

Gender Identity Ideology is now the Government instituted religion, IMO. Established government religion is unconstitutional in the US; I am not an adherent. I will not capitulate.

Signed, this GII Heretic

ETA:

If you truly don't believe in gender identity (as in, you're not attached to your own),

yeah, you’re a man. “stoopid females don’t know how they really are or what they’re talking about”. Pfphthhhh

if you believe transgender identification gives you extra privileges

Er, TI gives MEN extra privileges, it pisses all over me as a female, regardless of anything I could say.

there is literally nothing to lose & quite a lot to gain.

For MEN, for MEN, for MEN.

Have you mansplained this (how & what I could “gain”) somewhere for me to read? I’ve expressed my thoughts here:

https://www.saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/comments/8nq2/both_where_do_you_see_the_gender_wars_in_10_years/ (capturing my comment via permalink isn’t working for me tonight. ???)

[–]SnowAssMan[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am not an adherent

I predicted this response & addressed it pre-emptively. Apparently not effectively enough. Here is my second attempt. Heard of COINTELPRO? It was an operation instituted by the FBI to infiltrate & disrupt leftist groups. It's a winning strategy. Feminism has been breached by sexist male-privilege/entitlement via the transgender identity Trojan horse. So if anti-feminists can identify as feminists & implode feminism, why should the ostracised feminists be so opposed to overwhelming & re-defining transgender identity ideology?

Identity politics means if you have the "correct" identity, your speech becomes more valid on that topic. Most TRAs aren't trans-identified. If you were trans-identified you could go around saying "as a transgender person..." & use it to just call TRAs transphobes (which is what they fear most, calling everyone transphobic is their defence mechanism to avoid being called it themselves) & tell them to shut-up & let trans people speak i.e. you. Why accuse me of mansplaining when you literally needed it spelled out?

Sure "trans-men" & "NBs" don't have as much to gain, but I guess you could identify as a "trans-woman" lol that'd probably be a lot more effective, as among the transgender population there is a lot of "passing privilege" that you'd benefit from.

[–]BiologyIsReal 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It won't work because everyone knows who is a man and who is a woman, even if TRAs won't say it out loud. And TRAs are unlikely to buy this farse if we don't look the part and we speak out against any TRA talking point.