you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]one1won 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No.

Gender Identity Ideology is now the Government instituted religion, IMO. Established government religion is unconstitutional in the US; I am not an adherent. I will not capitulate.

Signed, this GII Heretic

ETA:

If you truly don't believe in gender identity (as in, you're not attached to your own),

yeah, you’re a man. “stoopid females don’t know how they really are or what they’re talking about”. Pfphthhhh

if you believe transgender identification gives you extra privileges

Er, TI gives MEN extra privileges, it pisses all over me as a female, regardless of anything I could say.

there is literally nothing to lose & quite a lot to gain.

For MEN, for MEN, for MEN.

Have you mansplained this (how & what I could “gain”) somewhere for me to read? I’ve expressed my thoughts here:

https://www.saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/comments/8nq2/both_where_do_you_see_the_gender_wars_in_10_years/ (capturing my comment via permalink isn’t working for me tonight. ???)

[–]SnowAssMan[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I am not an adherent

I predicted this response & addressed it pre-emptively. Apparently not effectively enough. Here is my second attempt. Heard of COINTELPRO? It was an operation instituted by the FBI to infiltrate & disrupt leftist groups. It's a winning strategy. Feminism has been breached by sexist male-privilege/entitlement via the transgender identity Trojan horse. So if anti-feminists can identify as feminists & implode feminism, why should the ostracised feminists be so opposed to overwhelming & re-defining transgender identity ideology?

Identity politics means if you have the "correct" identity, your speech becomes more valid on that topic. Most TRAs aren't trans-identified. If you were trans-identified you could go around saying "as a transgender person..." & use it to just call TRAs transphobes (which is what they fear most, calling everyone transphobic is their defence mechanism to avoid being called it themselves) & tell them to shut-up & let trans people speak i.e. you. Why accuse me of mansplaining when you literally needed it spelled out?

Sure "trans-men" & "NBs" don't have as much to gain, but I guess you could identify as a "trans-woman" lol that'd probably be a lot more effective, as among the transgender population there is a lot of "passing privilege" that you'd benefit from.

[–]BiologyIsReal 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It won't work because everyone knows who is a man and who is a woman, even if TRAs won't say it out loud. And TRAs are unlikely to buy this farse if we don't look the part and we speak out against any TRA talking point.

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nah, dude, your premise is faulty.

The strategy I outlined would expose that lie, via mass lobby.

Ffs, everyone (compos mentis) KNOWS it’s a lie. Women have spent decades publicly refuting the lie and warning of its consequences. Men are adding their voices. The problem is not “exposing the lie”, but counteracting the social meddling that’s been occurring for over a century. the indoctrination of children, the distracted, and the weak-minded for sexual access and control of the masses. Power, sex, control. So, () your condescension.

I predicted this response & addressed it pre-emptively.

No, you really didn’t. I stated GII is a defacto government instituted religion and I oppose it. Don’t hand wave that off. It’s not a “cop-out”. It’s a HUGE deal to informed American citizens. It’s against the First Amendment to the Constitution of my country. I get you aren’t American, but you just step back, dude.

Identity politics means if you have the "correct" identity, your speech becomes more valid on that topic…

Again, a faulty assumption. I submit relatively few are truly listening to the “identity” crew, evidenced by those who do, “peak”. Others who listen to TRAs support them out of their own interests (financial, political, social), but seriously, do you really think they think the “identifiers” words are valid?

The additional horror is the “identified” are being used, as marketing, as compliance drones, and worse. IMO, it’d be foolish and self harming for women to follow your suggestion.

[–]SnowAssMan[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought most people (moderates) went along with the trans thing, bc they think they are all transsexuals who have been surgically/magically transitioned into the opposite sex? I.e. not everyone knows it's a lie, some really are duped.

Again, most TRAs don't identify as transgender. By identifying as transgender you become harder to oppose or censor, as you could literally get them arrested for hate-speech (in places like the UK).