I whole-heartedly believe that a facility like that is for only feminine (cisgender) women to work... they're easier to talk to by default based on their sex (female) and gender (femininity), especially if they're middle-aged women. Society automatically trusts a gender conforming, older (cisgender) woman.

I disagree with this completely. You are making a whole bunch of inaccurate and frankly insultingly sexist and ageist assumptions here about the ways that both the providers and clients of sexual violence prevention and recovery services look, behave and think - and worse, how all such persons should look, behave and think.

I fear that many - probably most - women who have worked in sexual violence prevention and recovery programs, as well as many female clients and beneficiaries, would fail to meet your standards of "cisgender femininity" - whatever the hell those standards are, and whatever the hell "cisgender femininity" supposedly means.

they're easier to talk to by default based on their sex (female) and gender (femininity), especially if they're middle-aged women.

Could've fooled me. Many of the easiest persons persons I've ever talked to about my own personal experiences with sexual violence have been women who by today's standards were definitely not "cisgender" or "feminine." Many have been lesbians who by today's standards would be considered quite butch; others are women whom I recall as neither here nor there where it comes to gender presentation and who would be hard to pigeonhole as either particularly "feminine" or "masculine." One woman, a pioneer in the area of sexual violence prevention and recovery in the 1970s, was a terrible dresser and clueless about proper "gender presentation" norms by anyone's standards; several participants in a therapy/support group she ran that I attended wondered aloud if she had no mirrors in her home and got dressed in the dark - which she found very amusing and took as a compliment. Some of the persons I've found easiest to speak to about sexual violence that I and other women have experienced in childhood, adolescence and/or adulthood weren't even female themselves!

As a "natal female" with a masculine voice & appearance (I'm a gnc lesbian), I wouldn't even apply for a job where I might frighten timid (cisgender) women in need of assistance

You seem to have a very low opinion of women you perceive as "cisgender." You seem to think that based on your perceptions of other women's outward appearance, and what you project onto other women based on your perhaps skewed and faulty perceptions of their outer appearance, that most/all women who in your view are different to you in terms of looks and affect must all be intolerant, heterosexual, "cisgender," "timid" ninnies who would be put off and, worse, frightened near to death by a "gnc lesbian." Because, you seem to believe, they all just have to be died-in-the wool homophobes and rubes who've never encountered any "gnc" women, lesbian or not, in their lives before. To my mind, your POV is the epitome of prejudice.