Qt, Why is gender so important?

submitted by HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Nope just not engaging in the fight you’re very obviously looking to start. An environment where people are not punished for disagreeing with you is not a hostile environment. We are not obliged to follow gender theory to debate gender theorists. Having a big mad about that is not the dunk on us you’re acting like it is.

A hostile environment would be one where it was acceptable to call users slurs like “tranny” or “trap” or other nasty dehumanising language. It would be acceptable to simply make posts saying things like “trans women are all rapists”

Hostility is far more than simply refusal to be governed by a peer.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Ah, is the lady who posted "qt only posts to be mean" to the thunderous applause of the now 100% gc sub above such frivolity?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Your feelings are way too hurt over some mild snark about how many qt posters only ever respond in threads when they get to throw the word bigot around lol.

For a lurker you don’t seem to read anything qt has posted

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

They don't 'only ever' respond at all now though. :)

And for the record, qt posters aren't angels either. At the very least im of the opinion void/whatevertheywerecalledbeforeistartedlurking should have absolutely been banned.

I just can't get over how high and mighty you all are, don't worry, my feelings are very much still mostly intact!

And for all your aloof attitude about me, changing your flair for me is about the nicest thing anyone has ever done, so thanks for that.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

High and mighty says the one claimi mg total moral superiority on an obscure website populated by under ten people and abandoned by the three qt fools who finally got tired of repeating their one debunked argument. Good job. Hopefully you feel very accomplished now, having championed the moral failures of five people who hung around their fellow gcs after the qt users left once they did not get their way with ‘but clownfish! But intersex! But my feelings!’ As arguments.

Ta for the flair, don’t care what you feel about it I just enjoy particularly stupid sentiments.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Oh, don't get me wrong, I used this toxic dump as a source of entertainment, I'm certainly morally bankrupt in that department. Once again, just enjoying the mental gymnastics you're playing.

You cherry picking the shitty qt arguments doesn't absolve the actual ones i've seen posted here. The big radfem group in america basicly being in bed financially with the alt right? I'd say thats valid. That post got literally zero traction though, I wonder why. It certainly can't be that you're all for the most part here to dunk on teens who can't form a coheremt argument to save their lives, can it?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh cute so now I’m responsible for American alt right cause I don’t go to gender church lmao, or am I responsible for what posts get traction here? What did I do to be declared the face of the sub? Was it saying something you didn’t like as the self appointed moral guidance of the internet?

What a trip. You keep finding new reasons to crown yourself king of this hill like anyone is fighting you for it.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Oh, so you DO understand that individuals don't have responsibility for their group as a whole.

See, I would never have known, since you seem to only think that about yourself.

https://saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/comments/8agq/for_people_who_think_bathrooms_should_be/uspy

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A list of individuals who have committed terrible crimes and who are physically indistinguishable from the transwomen who do not commit those crimes as evidence that crimes against women are committed in bathrooms when qt says they aren’t, and highlights why we reject having transwomen in womens spaces even if they aren’t criminals..is somehow saying all transwomen are one single terrible man? If only you’d bothered with the context, where qt user claims that no transwoman has ever harmed a woman and that no woman had been attacked by any male at all in womens spaces.

Reading is fundamental. Git gud.

Actually, you wanna take up the mantle of who you’re championing and answer us how many women being attacked is enough to call it significant or be allowed to want to prevent it? The qt user involved never answered that question but since you’re our moral superior surely you can guide us

I’m certain it’s an absolute coinkydink that you stopped replying after such a massive failure and you didn’t spend the hour scouring my comments in vain hope of a gotcha. You must have just had business to attend to at the most convenient moment for you.

[–]beris😎 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you didn’t spend the hour scouring my comments

Correct. I don't know if you are aware of this, but hyperlinks are blue in most browsers on the internet. Quickly scrolling down until i found a wall of blue took me less than a minute.

And once again, not qt, don't disagree with you, doesn't change the fact that gishgalloping with anecdotal evidence isn't debating, it's virtue-signaling.

Edit:

I’m certain it’s an absolute coinkydink that you stopped replying after such a massive failure and you didn’t spend the hour scouring my comments in vain hope of a gotcha. You must have just had business to attend to at the most convenient moment for you.

I'm sure you not responding for over a day is indicitive of the same thing, right? Surely you don't sleep or work or do anything else but post exclusively here on this dead site.

As of now it is now bedtime, and I work in the morning, so don't expect me for a while since, yknow, if I don't give you my full itinerary I must be dodging a question.