you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

You probably also aren't as toxic as axe murderers and billionaires. You are allowed to be toxic while still being less toxic than other people. This shouldn't be something you need explained to you.

[–]BiologyIsReal 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Provide proof of specific examples or it didn't happen.

[–]beris😎 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You're the fucking mod, i've seen you remove gc comments for crossing the imaginary line of plausible deniability. You can scroll back in the moderation log and theres plenty of removed comments from gc users, BY YOU. The fucking gall to ask for proof when you know for a fact im right is amazing beyond words. Or did you not know the moderation log was public?

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes, I know the log is public.

There is nothing odd about asking for proof in a debate sub.

So, you recognize that I've deleted comments from GC users. Great! Though, I'm confused about how exactly this is proof I'm toxic against QT users. Shouldn't this proove the contrary?

Anyways, are you up to join the mod team and fix the supposedly umbalanced moderation? Yes or not?

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sure, I'd absolutely love to. I'll gladly moderate a debate sub with only one side, sounds like a piece of cake.

And so we're clear, never doing anything other than forcing comment edits after the fact is the problem. There's literally no reason for gc users not to be inflammatory, because they know they won't be punished in the slightest AND their overwhelmingly one-sided court of opinion will love them for it. Imagine how a qt user feels in that environment, I'm sure they're so glad that after having been slurred in some way the person in question was politely asked to edit their comment and nothing else.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ok, if you think being a mod is so easy, let's see how you fare. To be clear, since you have no posting history before this post and we cannot take your word for it, we'll watch over you and we'll remove you if you abuse the position. Do you accept this?

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, absolutely, I'll even recuse myself from this thread and not take any action against an unnamed user's direct and intentional rule-breaking since it could be construed that I did it spitefully. You could, though, enforce the rules as an unbiased third party. Prove you actually care about gc rule-breaking.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Probably aren’t as toxic as axe murderers..probably.. lmao you’re really putting axe murderers and people who disagree with qt on the same level and simultaneously saying we’re shit at arguing

Mate take the troll trophy and go celebrate a job well done. That’s legitimately hilarious.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You know, I see this a lot here and since I'm posting for a bit before we all admit this place is dead, I have to ask. Do you not know what hyperbole is? Does anyone here? Are you just reading 'axe-murderer' and ignoring the rest of the comment because you're seeing red or something?

Cause like, it's clear I'm saying that it's possible to be toxic without being "them" levels of toxic. It's clear that I'm being hyperbolic to laugh at the idea that because "actually, they're toxic" that you magically can't be any amount of toxic yourselves at all. Who knows, maybe I'm crazy.

And again, I'm not qt, I disagree with qt, so by your logic I've called myself as toxic as a billionaire, and that's just a mean thing to imply.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You cannot always tell the tone of someone through text. Besides, TRA literally think we are hate group that is driving trans identified people to suicide and that we are driving the murders of trans identified people. Just disagreeing with them is enough to earn that acussation. TRA literally think refering to someone's sex is way worse than death and rape threaths.