you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Cool story, dude. Now, why don't you apply all that theory into practice? I've a problem with your attitude, not your biology. Though, it must be said your attitude is pretty typical of your sex. Why do you think many feminists make fun of male "feminists"? Didn't you like studying social trends?

And I hope you don't forget to denounce any employer exclusionary union for discrimination.

[–]SnowAssMan 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You're not even able to articulate what it is about my "attitude" you dislike, so I'm not obliged to entertain the spurious criticism. Come back when you've read some feminist theory, until then I'll always be more of a feminist than you.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You're not even able to articulate what it is about my "attitude" you dislike, so I'm not obliged to entertain the spurious criticism.

I'm not sure what part of you acting like you were the only expert on feminism who must tell all the silly women what they have to do to fight back trans activists was not clear.

Come back when you've read some feminist theory, until then I'll always be more of a feminist than you.

I wasn't aware we were in a competence. Whatever, theory is useless if you don't put it into practice. I'll believe you when you are able to acept that a woman disagrees with you.

[–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

We've already established that I'm literally more of an expert on feminism than you are. So it's not an attitude, just the reality of the situation, which you are at fault for.

There is no way of you knowing whether I've been putting the theory into practise or not, since you are completely unfamiliar with the theory. There are men & women who agree with me & men & women who disagree with me. I've always been aware of that. No idea what relevance that is supposed to have.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We've already established that I'm literally more of an expert on feminism than you are. So it's not an attitude, just the reality of the situation, which you are at fault for.

Are you using the royal we now? Because you're the only one who has declared yourself as an expert on feminism. And you're who seems to think this is going to scare me.

There is no way of you knowing whether I've been putting the theory into practise or not, since you are completely unfamiliar with the theory. There are men & women who agree with me & men & women who disagree with me. I've always been aware of that. No idea what relevance that is supposed to have.

I can tell by what you say. You call yourself a feminist, but to be honest arguing with you doesn't feel any different that arguing with any other man. Why have you (supposedly) read feminist books besides for telling women off?

[–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're an ignoramus when it comes to feminist theory, making me only an expert by comparison. Prove otherwise.

Arguing with you is exactly like arguing with one of those androcentric choice feminists who can't accept that the word gender is a synonym for sex, even though it's been that way for over 500 years. I "tell off" a lot of people, stop cherry-picking only the female ones. You're not more feminist than I am by virtue of being a woman. You don't even read feminist works. You honestly expect never to be called-out on a feminist forum for being completely unfamiliar with feminist theory?

[–]Juniperius 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–]SnowAssMan 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your man Stoller has been in charge of feminism's re-definition of gender since 1970. Every time you say the equivalent of "sex & gender are not the same thing" you are quoting a man. I'm not making the decision that gender & sex should be regarded as synonyms. I'm just pointing out that they have been synonyms for over 500 years & continue to be synonyms even to this day, using a number of examples within every day life, academia & even feminism & transgenderism.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The past days you were complaining about feminists following Stoller's lead and here you are using him as example in a discussion about whether men can be feminists. Way to show you don't believe half the stuff you say.