This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Meta: Moderation and the rules

submitted by circlingmyownvoid2 from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

What rule did I break?

why would you threaten to ban circling? Did they break the rules, or just piss you off?

Part of why you told me to stop was I was being repetitive, You're repeating yourself now over and over.

Also why keep this stupid back-and-forth going when you ain't budging and I ain't budging. You're wrong. You think you're not. You whine I'm bringing this BS to you when you're the one that first told me to stop. You aint' winning anywhere but in your head. I'm good to let it go, maybe you also want the last word. I really think you're wrong here and the more you try to justify your bullshit the more inconsistent you seem. Like I said: enjoy the cesspool.

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Do I have to spell it for you? The rule about no personal attacks. Why did you think I mentioned that comments gets deleted and warnings are made once once the insults and personal attacks starts?

I did not start this. You're the one who started it by accusing me of protecting circling just because I did not do the exact thing you wanted. And you expect I stay quiet while you keep saying ourageous things about me? And you have put me in a position where if I mod against you now for your nonsense you would use against me to "prove" I'm "protecting" circling. And you expect I stay quiet? How more ridiculous are you going to get? And based on your past behaviour it's likely you're going to keep bringing up the "BIR protected a rape apologist" bullshit, anyway. So, why should I stay quiet?

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Not you being accused of defending the person who made a post because they felt attacked by you? On the post made to complain about you? By the person you’re being accused of defending?

Surely that’s not what’s actually happening right now?

Lmao Im sorry you’re dealing with all of this. You’re a wonderful mod and certainly the most present by far.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Well, you see, I didn't ban circling. So, that means I protecting circling, you know? Nevermind that I asked houseplant if she wanted circling baned. Or that I told circling to stop trying to explain away the victim blaming if circling didn't want to get baned. But you know, details...

Oh, but it gets better. Apparently if I don't ban circling, then I should ban Flippy because the latter don't want to be in the same group than circling...

I swear this whole thread feels like a comedy movie by now.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This thread is hilarious but I didn’t know if you were upset so I didn’t want to say it lol

The block button exists and even if you banned masks we’d just get a CMoV3 because we all always come back even if it’s just to lurk lol

[–]BiologyIsReal 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I'm upset, but the things Flippy keep saying are so absurd, and in this precise thread not less, that I'm laughing, too.

even if you banned masks we’d just get a CMoV3 because we all always come back even if it’s just to lurk lol

Tell me about it. I lost count of how many times I banned certain spammer who kept asking us what sex is...

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why don’t we just ask masks if they feel like you’re defending them?

Surly that would squash this whole argument pretty quickly?