This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (20 children)

[removed]

    [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

    I think you need to stop telling Houseplant what she has to do.

    [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

    I made 1 suggestion to her. I'm discussing the nature of this cesspool with her. CMOV2 has continually said that cmov2 is forbidden to discuss the matter but then often in the same sentence continues to make excuses for inexcusable behavior. That seems like laughing at the rules to me. I think I need to point out that the problem is CMOV2's doubling down on inexcusable behavior which, along with queztelwhateverthemod'snameis' in action caused catbug to leave. It's almost like CMOV2's behavior is no different that the rest of the TRAs behavior, make everything so intolerable so that they are all that is left. If you want to assist CMOV2 in making this place intolerable, go right ahead. I think I suggested to you what you should do if I'm the problem here.

    [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

    She has already took her decision.

    And I already warned circling not to keep discussing the issue if circling don't want to be banned. So, you saying I'm protecting circling is completely ridiculous.

    [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

    Ridiculous except for the part about circling continuing to discuss it and makes excuses for it and mischaracterize it every time circling says circling is not allowed to discuss it.

    Also, I agree she made her decision. I suggested it I think once and not since. I mentioned it to you once previously. I'm not like browbeating her into changing her mind. She's capable of reassessing that decision whenever circumstances change. But, as you see she had already left once already (edited to add once already) because of inaction regarding cmov2/masks.

    [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

    You can drop the subject now. Every comment has a handy report button. Use it when appropriate instead of implying I'm protecting circling just because I cannot be available 24/7.

    [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    fair enough, I reported a number of examples of victim blaming. One might not appear to be that, but it is a call for people to go back and look at what was originally said to Catbug, which was victim blaming. So, that one by being a direct reference to the original incident is a repetition of the original incident.

    If you think this is a question of unruly children needing a parent to separate them or send them all into time out, I think you are misreading. I think this is a case of one member trying to make this place unreasonable, the thread where all this occurs a case of that member making an accusation against you in spite of the common knowledge of what that member did and thus calling attention to it again. This is TRA tactics in a microcosm, make everything unbearable so that they are all that is left in any "public" spaces.

    If repeated victim blaming is not bannable, or if you think that is not what is going on here, then ban me from the cesspool and I'll contemplate the differences between moderation and well reasoned enforcement of rules, a difference between civility and decency.

    [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

    Dude, I'm not going to ban you just because you've put into your head to enact a scenary where you're a martym who feels morally superior to the misguided mod who "chose" to "protect" circling over other members of the sub.

    Like I said, circling's orginal comments happened before I became a mod. For better or worse, what is done is done and there is no point in re-modding over incidents that happened moths ago. However, I gave Houseplant the opportunity to choose whether to ban circling since she was the one affected over circling's comments, but she rejected it. Circling has repeated circling's points recently, and that is why comments were deleted and I gave circling an ultimatum. You can drop this baseless idea that I'm going easy on circling now

    [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

    You can recast my posts and make assumptions about my motivation all you want, but bottom line is CMOV2 took every opportunity to talk about his/her/whatever/thems/its/Idon'tknowactually victim blaming and you can interpret that as not a viiolation of a rule. But why are you telling me to stop pointing it out? Is calling out victim blaming and rape apology and all the other rule violations CMOV2 committed in those actions against the rules? You could lock a topic if you don't like the discussion, but instead you want to protect CMOV2 from being reminded of what a POS CMOV2 is. Good luck keeping the cesspool muy cessy. Rationalize it all you want. you could have banned a monster for victim blaming you you'd rather pretend there is some other context that invalidates that reality.

    [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    Oh, my goodness, get off your high horse, dude! I'm NOT protecting circling. I don't give a damn about circling. I absolutely cannot stand circling. Anyone who have read our many argurments would realize this obvious fact.

    Moreover, I didn't call you out for pointing out circling's victing blaming (way to twist my words, dude). I call you out because you are claiming that I'm either protecting circling (why the heck would I do that?) or I'm too stupid to realize who is the wrong here. And you're conveniently ignoring the fact I didn't call out all the other people calling out circling for circling's shitty behaviour.

    Futhermore, you're also ignoring I'm usually pretty quick in intervening once arguments here starts to get more heated up than usual. Once insults and personal attacks begins comments get deleted and warnings are issuednot matter who is doing it because in my experience things can only go down hill from there. I do this precisely so this place doesn't become a cesspool. I cannot make special exceptions for some people just because I happen to agree more with them.

    And why are you singling me out in this mess, anyway? Why aren't you also complaining about this with grixit or peaking, too? I'm really tired that I'm always the one who gets blamed for everything that happens here just because I'm the most active mod!