This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Meta: Moderation and the rules

submitted by circlingmyownvoid2 from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Fine I’ll end with this. It’s not about rape it’s about people. If you could let someone bleed out without calling 911, I fundamentally can’t understand your lack of respect for life.

You fundamentally cannot understand my lack of respect for someone who’s lack of respect led them to R A P I N G me. You put my morals on trial out of everyone’s in that situations and you think that’s normal or okay?

[–][deleted]  (27 children)

[removed]

    [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

    Tempting, but I think the rest of the community should be able to decide that too. Not a public trial or anything, but like, a message to bir or peaking sort of deal.

    [–][deleted]  (25 children)

    [removed]

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      I don’t disagree that masks has been a frequently troublesome user, and in my experience has yet to make a good faith argument. I just don’t wanna have the power to have someone banned. I’d rather it wasn’t my say so.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      I feel like this is a microcosm of the whole set of problems this sub is about, as well as all the GC subs. Were you banned as "Catbug"?

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Nah, abandoned the account cause I had planned on leaving the community due to masks, and porcelain quetzal saying he didn’t break any rules and wasn’t that out of line. Decided not to be pushed out by some feral guys and rejoined with a new account.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Wow, it really is a microcosm of the whole GC thing. They misbehave, whine when called out on it, the authorities play 'both you kids cut it out', and decent people suffer while pigs enjoy shit and mud, decent people leave, and we have the internet (and increasingly life) from say 2015 onward.

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It does serve as a fine example of why we are right when we say that there are transwomen out here oozing misogyny, rape apologia, and male socialisation and cling to victimhood status whilst doing so.

      [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

      I think you need to stop telling Houseplant what she has to do.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

      I made 1 suggestion to her. I'm discussing the nature of this cesspool with her. CMOV2 has continually said that cmov2 is forbidden to discuss the matter but then often in the same sentence continues to make excuses for inexcusable behavior. That seems like laughing at the rules to me. I think I need to point out that the problem is CMOV2's doubling down on inexcusable behavior which, along with queztelwhateverthemod'snameis' in action caused catbug to leave. It's almost like CMOV2's behavior is no different that the rest of the TRAs behavior, make everything so intolerable so that they are all that is left. If you want to assist CMOV2 in making this place intolerable, go right ahead. I think I suggested to you what you should do if I'm the problem here.

      [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

      She has already took her decision.

      And I already warned circling not to keep discussing the issue if circling don't want to be banned. So, you saying I'm protecting circling is completely ridiculous.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

      Ridiculous except for the part about circling continuing to discuss it and makes excuses for it and mischaracterize it every time circling says circling is not allowed to discuss it.

      Also, I agree she made her decision. I suggested it I think once and not since. I mentioned it to you once previously. I'm not like browbeating her into changing her mind. She's capable of reassessing that decision whenever circumstances change. But, as you see she had already left once already (edited to add once already) because of inaction regarding cmov2/masks.

      [–]BiologyIsReal[M] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

      You can drop the subject now. Every comment has a handy report button. Use it when appropriate instead of implying I'm protecting circling just because I cannot be available 24/7.

      [–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

      fair enough, I reported a number of examples of victim blaming. One might not appear to be that, but it is a call for people to go back and look at what was originally said to Catbug, which was victim blaming. So, that one by being a direct reference to the original incident is a repetition of the original incident.

      If you think this is a question of unruly children needing a parent to separate them or send them all into time out, I think you are misreading. I think this is a case of one member trying to make this place unreasonable, the thread where all this occurs a case of that member making an accusation against you in spite of the common knowledge of what that member did and thus calling attention to it again. This is TRA tactics in a microcosm, make everything unbearable so that they are all that is left in any "public" spaces.

      If repeated victim blaming is not bannable, or if you think that is not what is going on here, then ban me from the cesspool and I'll contemplate the differences between moderation and well reasoned enforcement of rules, a difference between civility and decency.