you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

As we’ve discussed as nauseum they don’t want 3rd spaces because they’ve determined assimilation is the path to safety.

And that is YOUR problem, not ours. Women DON'T own you and any other [NOT A WOMAN] absolutely NOTHING!!! We'have more than enough dealing all those men invading women's spaces.

The trans woman in the olympics didn’t hit the base lift so hardly a ringing endorsement of your outrage.

How many athletets do you know that debut at the Olympics at 43 years of age and with a big gap on their sporting carreer?!!!

Bodies with vaginas isn’t dehumanizing. Its a specific group which isn’t accurately described by “women”. That’s like saying “bodies over 5’7” is dehumanizing.

And you say this bullshit just after claiming that me saying you don't give a fuck about women is an ad-hominen attack?!! How is reducing us to body parts or functions not dehumanizing, [circling]? The word women is perfectly fine. There are only two sexes and humans can't change sex. How you "identify as" has no place in biology. That is enough! If you don't see how this is dehumanizing then I won't bother with this stupid rule about "misgendering". We're in this stupid mess because society have bend backwards to accomadate all the absurd demands by men pretending to be "women" for far too long. I'm going to call you exactly what you are: [NOT A WOMAN]. A mysgogynist [not a woman] who don't give a fuck about women like a typical [not a woman].

At least hormonally yes. And yes, I almost certainly would be what with the normal sized body, lack of cromagnon features and all.

You're [not a woman]. You couldn't have gone through a "hormonal female puberty". What a nonsense. Please pick some biology books.

I listen to doctors who control actual guidance and aren’t in the pocket of the Christian Right and anti trans money.

So, you only listed to doctors who are payed by trans lobby, got it. And you didn't read any of those links, aren't you? You just decided they were religious zealots. Anything to keek your male head in the sand, right?

Whatever, arguing with a [not a woman] like you was a total wasted of my time.

Edit: Redacted following ACLU's style to comply with the rules...

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

If you are going to violate the rules by blatantly misgendering me I won’t dignify it with a response.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

What is the problem, [not a woman]? Didn't you say that "transition" was an adequated treatment for gender dysphoria? If you say your mental health has improved because of it, then you shouldn't have a meltdown every single time anyone refers to your sex. If you were secure about not being a man my words wouldn't affect you. I don't have an existencial crisis when people mistake me for a man because I know I'm a woman.

Edit: Redacted following ACLU's style to comply with the rules...

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I’m not having a meltdown, but you aren’t respecting the rules of the space and your insults demonstrate that you clearly aren’t interested in productive discussion.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I tried to have a productive discussion. You're the one who wasn't interested. I just had enough with your bullshit.

By the way, it's pretty funny you say you're not having a meltdown when you immediately made a thread to remove me as a mod.

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That’s not a meltdown. You are in a position of authority in charge of enforcing the rules and openly ignored and decried them. So I raised the concern to the group. In what way is that a “meltdown” and not simply the logical response to an abuse of power?

[–]BiologyIsReal 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Thank you for making me laugh! Imagine to call refering someone's sex an abuse of power! You guys are truly to used to get all your demands met that can't handle when someone refuse to play along with you. That is the only reason that rule was in place. QT don't have a problem in calling us "cis" (despite we don't like it) or a hate group, so why GC the only side that has to play nice?

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You are in a position of authority tasked with enforcing the rules. Instead you mocked and flouted them. That is clearly and obviously you abusing your authority.

The rules also bar cis, meaning I make a point to say “natal” here instead of cis even though it is entirely foreign and isn’t used anywhere else. Because it’s a matter of respecting the rules of the space.

The hope is to maintain some level of civil discourse which is lost when you start hurling insults at people.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The rules also bar cis

Technically, they don't.

The hope is to maintain some level of civil discourse which is lost when you start hurling insults at people.

Says the [person] who is constantly is throwing baseless acussations and call male users monsters.

Also, the word man is not an insult. It's you who interpret it that way because of your self-hate.

Edit: Redacted following ACLU's style to comply with the rules...

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Also, the word man is not an insult.

I disagree. I don’t think cis is an insult (in fact it’s objectively better to be) but I don’t call you that because you object. But apparently you aren’t willing to engage in even that minimal civility.