you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

It’s a model of a paraphilia not a ‘gender disorder’ goddamn dude.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

His twitter bio says "Researcher in sexual orientation, paraphilias, & gender identity disorders"

His theory is that gay men are naturally feminine. As in the gender bits that gender critical is critical of are natural and that autogynephilia is not strictly a fetish but a sexual target error.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Why does his Twitter bio mean that the agp theory is a theory of gender disorders lmao. That’s complete nonsense.

I feel you have surely misinterpreted the theory of agp.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

What have I said here that's wrong?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I disagree that it’s a typology of gender disorders and is a model of a paraphilia. Sorry bro thought that was clear.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Do you class HSTS as a gender disorder?

What would you compare "agp" to?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don’t think a gender disorder is a thing. Agp is a paraphilia. Idk what is compare it to, idk that there are other paraphilia similar.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

OK but that's how Blanchard classes them. He says his subject is gender identity disorders and paraphilias. If you use the term you are lending support to those ideas. It is part of a model gender.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I assume the gender disorder is the paraphilia tbh. The paraphilia is what causes the person to engage in the gendered behaviour and costume of the target sex.

I accept the paraphilia exists without supporting the idea that femininity and masculinity are sexed personality traits.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You like the bits about paraphilia but reject the bits about gay men and femininity. That looks conveniently selective about his science.

Where is the anti Blanchard science saying men and women are equally masculine and feminine?