you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]inkling 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Regardless of whether you care if trans people kill themselves or not, it seems obvious to me that if there is a proven bad outcome for trans people without gender affirming policies and no evidence for a bad outcome for cis people with gender affirming policies, gender affirming policies should be preferable.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So… Everyone else sacrificing their needs, rights and comfort for trans people is the most morally correct thing.

Because you personally think so.

Got it.

I understand the studies- the most morally correct thing is still to attempt to make the most people possible Feel safe, comfortable and as if they have equal rights. (And to make sure that trans people are given whatever mental health assistance they may need to cope with the fact of their biology and the fact that other people matter and have rights)

Third spaces for trans people is how you do that. That’s the most fair. That’s the most correct. The world doesn’t revolve around trans people.

Do you think it’s morally correct to force the rest of the population to be responsible for your mental health?

[–]inkling 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Because you personally think so.

No, because the evidence says so

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The “evidence” says nothing about morals.

And I don’t get why it’s moral to make 99% of the population uncomfortable for 1%