you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Answering my own questions from yesterday, I think there are many simmilarities between people who claim to be "non-binary" or other alternative "gender identities" and people who claim to be the opposite sex. Both base their identities in an ideal that cannot be physically obtained, rely a lot on stereotypes, require a lot of external "validation", and dismiss the importance of biological sex. I also read some accounts of people who use a "non-binary identity" as a stepping stone to either identify as the opposite sex or to detransition. Because of this, it surprises me that some people don't believe in the "non-binary" stuff, yet they still say TWAW and TMAM or believe in "true trans". I don't know, I feel like questioning the former would eventually lead to questioning the latter.

I too think neo-pronouns are anoying.

As for official documents, I think they should always reflect reality.