you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

So there is a pattern between trans identities and sexual orientation that does not correlate with the background population?

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

I believe so. We are substantially more likely to be bi or homosexual (by your reckoning) than either sex’s norm.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

And more likely to be gnc relative to gender identity.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

Hard to separate that from the social component though

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

My thinking is the patterns show at least two probably three innate traits going on, in relation to biological sex.

Orientation, expression, identity.

If they were not innate they would not be so consistent.

If they were directly related they would be more one to one.

If they were not indirectly related there would be no connecting pattern at all.