you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser[S] 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

I'm happy to use science and refer to science papers. Some will be good and some will be bad.

Over all I don't think the scientific community supports the blank slate or absolute behavioural gender equality.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Science doesn’t support the idea of blank slates or absolute behavioural gender equality…Nobody does. You just told yourself we do despite being corrected by two seperate users itt.

If a study is bad, it’s also not science. You really need to understand that word better.

I don’t care what you think science supports. What you think science supports and what is actually accurate are entirely seperate.

You can keep posting book reviews if you hate facts so much, just don’t call it the science of whatever. Call it the opinions of whoever, since that’s what’s actually being discussed.