Gender dysphoria doesn't exist

submitted by SexualityCritical from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkTwainiac 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I will restate my original charge: you don't seem to know what the word "genetic" means.

Biologically, there's nothing different between a rape victim and someone who isn't a victim of rape. If we could actually know for sure if someone had been raped, through biology, we'd know, since biology would be there. As long as it doesn't involve sexual assault

WTF? Rape victims frequently show physical signs of having been raped - bruising & tearing of the genitals & the area around the genitals; injuries to other parts of the body; the rapists' semen, saliva & fingerprints on the victims' bodies; STDs. A female victim of rape might well have become pregnant as a result.

Your contention that rape doesn't always involve "involve sexual assault" is as ignorant & offensive as your comments on depression.

You don't need sex in order to get pregnant. Pregnant simply occurs when a vagina arrives into contact with sperm.

I never said that a female person needs to have sex to get pregnant. In an era of IUI, IVF & turkey baster babies, who on earth would make such a silly claim? I simply said that over the course history

legions of girls & women have gotten pregnant the first time they had PIV

I am simply challenging your preposterous claim that there's no way ever to tell whether individuals have had sex or not because having sex never results in any physical or psychological changes discernible to themselves or others.

As to your claim that "Pregnant simply occurs when a vagina arrives into contact with sperm," LOL, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Depression is, in its essence, literally defined by an absence of a person's ability to experience happiness, even while faced with things they love, while committing themselves to things they'll hope will make them happier. That sounds entirely genetic to me.

Well, if it sounds that way to you in all your obvious wisdom, then what you think is true must be true with absolute certainty. Case closed. LOL.

[–]SexualityCritical[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know why you took my 'involving sexual assault' comment out of context. I presume it was an accident? I doubt you'd be deliberately disingenuous. I stated that any system, which could figure out if someone has been raped, or even more specifically, raped by a certain individual under legal suspicion, that doesn't involve sexual assault, would be a good invention. Obviously, all rape involves sexual assault. I don't really know how you misread my written sentiment, but whatever. You, also, appear to have misunderstood my first statement. I never claimed that rape doesn't create physical injuries for the victim, or that there aren't material scars which have manifested onto the bodies of the victims of sexual violence. Women and men can, and do, have injured genitalia from being raped. Now, the thing is, this is what I was saying, a person can have all these injuries, can have sustained them, from non-sexual activities. Anyone can be injured in an identical way, so there's no method of discovering they've been raped, or have had sexual intercourse. Again, there are zero genetic differences between virgins and non-virgins. Whether one has had sex or not, it cannot be biologically recognised. No technology can scan for this, nor can it be visually determined.

'I simply said that over the course history..." You appear to have cut yourself off here. I believe you were attempting to say something more? Well, anyway, since someone doesn't need to have sex in order to get pregnant, there is no physical evidence which can be pointed to, to show if someone has experienced sexual intercourse, or who has endured any level of sexual touching.

"Pregnant simply occurs when a vagina arrives into contact with sperm," LOL, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about." Yet... you said, "In an era of IUI, IVF & turkey baster babies, who on earth would make such a silly claim?" What? I'm not really sure what you were trying to say here.