you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

More QT participants! Being on Reddit helped to people come to debate even though is an awful place.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

Why not make the rules QT friendly then? Forbid references to other posters as part of arguments, especially as the reason someone thinks something. Maybe appoint an actual QT mod as having a trans GC mod isn’t the same. The sub is called GCdebatesQT not GCdebatesTrans.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We had like a whole week when almost everyone post was us all collectively trying to work out rules. Meaning QT had ample time to voice their opinions on rules, and the only thing you guys focused on was the pronouns thing. Which- worth focusing on, but even after a few of us pointed out that it was mostly gc commenting and we needed more qt comments… no qt commented.

It’s not because of the rules. It’s because qt don’t need to come to saidit because they atill have Reddit.

And obviously since some of the trans people here are gc the sub is still very much gcdebatesqt.

[–]BiologyIsReal 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, they focused only in pronouns and they got what they wanted at the end because the rule about "misgendering" was not changed.