you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

Yikes sweaty recognising the bee monarchy? Enjoy the wrong side of history. All bees are queens

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Crap, of course they are!!!!

But if they are, then does that mean that working as slaves is empowering?

Gosh, I really need to educate myself, are there courses in universities (Canada or the USA I assume) about the power dynamics and history in bee society?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

University? No But there are some courses available through Instagram users where you can learn unsubstantiated theory and the delicate operation of proving your theory via calling people names and questioning their morals until they agree with you or become silent.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Even better! People on Instagram or TikTok are the real experts anyway!

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Personal opinions shared in 30 second videos is the only way to get facts. The scientific method is just oppression.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Even in that case, you need to research the person' s credentials: you can' t trust anyone who doesn' t have pronouns in their bio, for example.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Oh you gotta check their carrd and see if they have enough pronouns to be considered reliable. Don’t be fooled by things like expertise or degrees. Empirical evidence is actually a ploy to make you think there’s something wrong with taking the word of someone with something to gain from deceiving you.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I know, people nowadays are all so distrustful, especially online. You need to trust human beings, why would they lie about anything, especially when they can gain something from it?

It never happens!

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Personally I don’t believe anything unless it’s told to me by a male teenager who identifies as a female Chinese dragon and doctor who at the same time. Anything ever printed in a textbook is literal violence.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I know, I have no clue why Gutenberg isn' t considered the genocidal maniac he clearly was. By inventing printing press, everything that has ever been written is his responsibility, and that includes bullshit like treaties on the dimorphism of sex.