you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SnowAssMan 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

At least you didn't pretend that they are not autogynaephiles, or that autogynaephiles don't exist. You're not as obtuse as GenderBender, it seems.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (3 children)

No I don’t believe in autogynephilia as it’s usually described, nor do I believe that what is happening solely affects trans women

[–]SnowAssMan 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Back-pedal, back-pedal. Such an unlikely paraphilia, right? All the others definitely exist, just not that one lol. Autogynaephilia is in the DSM-5 – the Trans Bible. What about men who admit to being agp? Do they not exist either?

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

There’s no back pedaling?

No all the others don’t objectively exist either.

I believe that if they’re calling themselves AGP then they have a misconception about the nature of their sexuality.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So they misunderstand their own identity or sexuality? They literally don’t understand their own thoughts, feelings, and experiences? But you understand it? What would you say if you had the opportunity to correct their understanding of their sexuality?