This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (19 children)

How do you know they are "ignored"? Just because I didn't see a point in responding to the comments in previous threads that I read and agreed with doesn't mean they were unread and ignored. I take the time to make a detailed post and explain all my thoughts in it. That should be enough to get answers

[–]worried19 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

This is a debate sub. We're meant to engage with other users, not simply post long monologues and leave.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (17 children)

Well there's no other sub where I can post these long monologues to get answers. They always tell me to do that in GCdebatesQT.

[–]BiologyIsReal 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

If you agree with us, you could always debate with the QT side for once instead of keep asking us the same questions... Or you could write a blog...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (15 children)

GCs have proven to be as bad as TRAs. They believe a child or someone who removes their sex organs is desexed or sexless (not male and not female): https://imgur.com/0cxkT9u

It's perfectly reasonable to consider children essentially sexless. Girls and boys are not yet women and men. They're distinct but until puberty the distinction is minimal.

Even in cases where everything has been removed, the other system hasn't been implanted so the most you can claim is that they've been desexed (as people used to say about eunuchs).

https://imgur.com/MLP7lfI

I'm not sure what your problem is. When you take a cat or dog to the vet to be neutered the dog or cat is considered de-sexed? Why is the term not appropriate when you apply it to humans?

I'm fine with debating GCs for now.

[–]BiologyIsReal 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First, one person is not all GC, you know? We're not a monolith. Second, pretty sure that user is thinking more about sex as sexual acts than sex as biological category. Third, as far as I know, desexed indeed means castrated.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gc generally does not think this because it’s wrong.

Does one persons incorrect opinion really represent what gc actually thinks? Why is one wrong comment that doesn’t even reflect gc ideas enough for you to dismiss all gc?

[–]kwallio 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Are you some kind of pedophile? Why are you so obsessed with the sex organs of children? And whether GC people consider the child a sexed individual or not? If you remove your genitals you have de-sexed yourself, this is generally speaking common terminology.

You never answered my question BTW.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Fortunately they’re blocked for the next month.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 8 fun2 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Are you dumb? I was a kid once. You're telling me I was a freaking sexless creature instead of a girl back then, and when I had crushes on other girls I was crushing on sexless creatures. It's insulting as fuck, so of course I would be obsessed with it.

I never answered your dumb questions because you like banning people. I got banned. But you don't realize banning is pointless. People can change IPs and create new accounts. Good job banning people like TRAs did to you lol. You're no better than them.