you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

I think sometimes the social model is better though instead of the medical model, especially in education and other non-medical settings. For me though I would never cure my learning disability, though I would cure other things I have. What was more disabling was discrimination in the school.

We should not replace the term disability. I and many of us in our community loathe the term special needs and handi-capable. I know the non-disabled community likes the term special needs, but to us, it's stigmatizing and othering. Due to this stigma I felt embarrassed for being disabled during my teenage years. These terms just another euphemism for disability. People are afraid of using words like disability, disabled, autistic, etc. so they invent euphemisms like special needs and handi-capable or even people first language. People first language (for those who don't know) is putting the person before the disability, i.e. saying "person with a disability" instead of "disabled person" saying "person with autism" instead of "autistic person." Some people in our community prefer it and that's OK, but many do not. Yet abled people who are often parents of disabled kids or work with disabled people insist it's the polite term and saying "autistic" is rude, even though actual autistic people don't think so and many feel autism is part of their identity. Some people are even told how to identify themselves, that they should not call themselves disabled or blind or whatever. Many people also want to emphasize someone is a person before their disability. It's almost as if being disabled and being a person is mutually exclusive. I corrected someone online for using the term handi-capable for a character. I simply said most disabled people don't the term and to use disabled instead, and that person thanked me. I wish we would stop being afraid to use the term disability and stop euphemizing it. Parents, teachers and professionals should not be afraid to tell a child they're disabled, or talk about disability with children. It's OK to use the words disability and disabled.

On another note, denying someone medical treatment is ableist. Without my SSRI, I would be lying in bed all day. Yet there are people who will insist you shouldn't take anti-depressants or any medication because it's big pharma. I think the term big pharma should apply to pharmaceutical companies because I have criticisms for them, but not the people who need these medications to function. Some people think the profession of psychiatry should be eliminated, which is ableist, because many people would suffer without psychiatry or access to medical treatment in general.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaIs clownfish a clown or a fish? 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree on most part with you, but it is not what that model is proposing. That model is mainly saying that it is society which is fault in disabilities, which is not true. Society's fault is in lack of tolerance and in very able-male-centric "standart" of building everything. It has something to do with capitalistic model as well, because disabled people are minorities, so there no reason to spend time and money to design and rebuild things for disabled people. That's why government need to intervene and that's why in more "social oriented government" countries, like in Europe, disabled people have much more quality of life, as it is demanded by government from everyone. Obviously all this should be done automatically, but majority of people are measuring others by themselves - so they may not even know that someone on wheelchair can need something more. Have you read "Invisible Women" by Carez?

Some people think the profession of psychiatry should be eliminated, which is ableist, because many people would suffer without psychiatry or access to medical treatment in general.

I saw that in USA and Russia mainly. Conservatives in USA and Russia are propagating that psychiatry and (especially) psychology does not exist at all and it is like Astrology, just a way to get money from stupid people. They think it has no scientific background and they do not believe those can help anyone at all (and religious conservatives can even say that psychiatry is creating of a devil to confuse people, as god can cure any diseas of a soul and any anxiety).