All: Why do a lot of trans people insist that being non binary or trans has nothing to to with stereotyoes, and then suddenly it really is about stereotypes?

submitted by questioningtw from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]adungitit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

If you say something, and you are asked to rationalise it, awkwardly derailing and avoiding the questions because you know you're full of hot air is not "progressing the debate". Debate cannot be had if one side knows they have no argument and instead expends all their efforts into trying to avert attention from the fact that they have no argument, hoping that this will somehow make it seem like they're not actually wrong just because they ignore and disengage from what proves them wrong.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

To be honest you are the person here I find the most difficult to debate.

It comes across as a list of accusations.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

If you read this person's other posts, you'll know their perception of reality is heavily laced with self-victimisation and sociological inferences that "femininty" and "masculinity" are created by the patriarchy, the problem with that is those concepts are made to describe a series of patterns exhibited by society at the time (e.g most girls playing with dolls, not many boys play with dolls = dolls are a girl thing) and these patterns are separated into categories "feminine" and "masculine" in the observer's respective culture. It doesn't matter if it's because women are oppressed or not (analysis of this would be a separate topic, this is about observing society's patterns and behaviours in groups), the pattern is going to be there and observed as such and as society changes, what is feminine or masculine also changes, in other words, femininty and masculinity is dynamic. "Gender" cannot be "removed", it's just a dynamic category. The person you are arguing with is also sexist towards women, the group of women it's trying to support the rights of.

I'm at this point ready to say this person is a troll or some nutter who thinks that it has won an argument when a person stops posting. His logic has a lot more holes than a badly written plot

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (9 children)

the pattern is going to be there and observed as such and as society changes, what is feminine or masculine also changes, in other words, femininty and masculinity is dynamic. "Gender" cannot be "removed", it's just a dynamic category.

I agree or at least I think I do.

Masculine and feminine is dynamic to a degree.

However they are always going to emerge, because humans have a desire to gender things. Also in that sense gender non conformity is cross conformity.

Also the genders can't be so dynamic that they contradict physical reality.

But there can be behavioural traits as well as physical traits.

For instance criminality seems to have a universal higher rate among men.

I'm at this point ready to say this person is a troll or some nutter who thinks that it has won an argument when a person stops posting. His logic has a lot more holes than a badly written plot

Well they do claim to be a woman and I believe them. I do think they might be traumatized person. But their arguments are consistent with some in gc. But then I think gc is more than one group but also that the different gc positions ought to be formalised to a degree.

Both "gc" and "qt" have different schools of thought.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Males are biologically stronger, they won the biological arms race before people started developing complex civilisations, the culture to commit what we would consider to be crimes today, was fostered and carried over and exhibited in those civilisations, of course there's going to be some level of consistency. We can also say that maybe males have more of a biological impulsive need to be assholes and to win Darwin Awards, but honestly, that seems more nurture than nature. We humans don't actually have the need to gender, we just happen to observe and noticed a pattern and sorted that information.

I wouldn't call it "cross conformity", originally we used "non-conformity" to describe if we don't match our respective gender's stereotype and by extension, how society percieves the individual. It makes zero sense to create another terminology to basically say "you share features of something in another category", much similar to non-binary and agender existing as a list of valid genders.

We can't change our genders (e.g. woman, man), but our gender stereotypes can be changed (how we see women and men).

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (7 children)

I wouldn't call it "cross conformity", originally we used "non-conformity" to describe if we don't match our respect gender's stereotype and by extension, how society percieves the individual. It makes zero sense to create another terminology to basically say "you share features of something in another category", much similar to non-binary and agender existing as a list of valid genders.

Well sure. But sometimes gc can be rather partisan on gender non conformity.

It can deny female non conformity is aligning with masculinity.

It can say female non conformity is good and male non conformity is bad. Indeed male conformity is often everything gc feminists are wanting to get away from.

But gender non conformity always selects gender norms.

If everyone was gender non conforming we would still have gender norms. Gender would not be abolished.

If half of the population of both sexes were gnc that would be more like it. Or if an equal portion were androgynous.

But we still run into physical elements that are mixed into "gender."

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I don't know where you get the whole "male non conformity is bad.", but GC just hate that the non-conformity is being used as the basis for transition and have stated a couple of times that transwomen explanations are not just stupid, but also deluded, sexist and is also pseudoscience. The fact the trans movement is using the whole "I like this typical gender stereotype hobby" or "I act like this particular gender stereotype" destroys one of the aims of the feminist movement, to make society see past the person's sex and to give them a chance and treat them with equality and equity.

But gender non conformity always selects gender norms.

Gender norms is whatever that is observed in the society and established by what the majority of target study groups profile (e.g. majority of females sew and many of them like sewing, not many males sew and a lot don't like sewing) Gender non-conformity is to describe a person's diversion fron the gender stereotypical profile of observed behaviours in their respective local culture. It does not "select", it does not have a will of its own, for it is a concept and a word a person would use to describe someone in relation to their own society. It is as dynamic as gender-norms and is used to communicate what the user thinks and want to say.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

I don't know where you get the whole "male non conformity is bad.",

What male non conformity does gc generally like? There are always large sections of gc who don't like the reality of male gnc behaviour.

Good male gnc ends up being either something very mildly gnc or a "magical gnc super state" that exists virtually after all the actual forms of it are rejected.

but GC just hate that the non-conformity is being used as the basis for transition and have stated a couple of times that transwomen explanations are not just stupid, but also deluded, sexist and is also pseudoscience. The fact the trans movement is using the whole "I like this typical gender stereotype hobby" or "I act like this particular gender stereotype" destroys one of the aims of the feminist movement, to make society see past the person's sex and to give them a chance and treat them with equality and equity.

Well sure I get the idea. But it that still doesn't get around the gnc issue. There isn't actually something being other than masculinity or femininity. It's a binary and spectrum at best.

Gender norms is whatever that is observed in the society and established by what the majority of target study groups profile (e.g. majority of females sew and many of them like sewing, not many males sew and a lot don't like sewing) Gender non-conformity is to describe a person's diversion fron the gender stereotypical profile of observed behaviours in their respective local culture. It does not "select", it does not have a will of its own, for it is a concept and a word a person would use to describe someone in relation to their own society. It is as dynamic as gender-norms and is used to communicate what the user thinks and want to say.

Right it's dynamic and emergent. Almost like people naturally want to do "gender." It doesn't go away.

Aren't gnc people doing "gender" as well? The more gnc they are the more they are doing "gender."

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What male non conformity does gc generally like? There are always large sections of gc who don't like the reality of male gnc behaviour.

You're going to have to show me this, because from what I've seen they care more about deluded insecure creepy males then a bunch of non-deluded ones who are feminine cross-dressers who like to infiltrate women only spaces and can see through the TRA bullshit. I've read a lot of their reddit pages and I have been on their saidit from the very start. I interact with fellow GC there. I don't agree nor disagree that there're GC who hate feminine males, but I have yet to see a lot or any posts that reflects the attitudes GC as a whole, have about feminine males. I haven't seen a single post where someone who has held an account and have been a regular GC visitor who has expressed this type of sentiment there before. GC target males who try to make everyone else accept their delusions, penalise them for not using their pronoun choice of the day (because no one cares and they can see it's a male), request or demand special treatment and want to invade female spaces. Cross-dressers don't do any of that, in case you're wondering and if they did, they're not cross-dressing, they're trying to "be a woman". Speaking of which, if you're going to do performative work as some gender stereotype at the workplace, and it's not part of your job and you're using that to invade sex specific spaces you're normally prohibited from entering, then you're a creep and you deserve to be fired. If you're just cross-dressing in work appropriate attire, follow the rules and don't ask for special treatment, no one cares. I'm very curious about your claim.

At most, I have seen a lot that just blatantly hate the male race in general.

Well sure I get the idea. But it that still doesn't get around the gnc issue. There isn't actually something being masculinity or femininity. It's a binary and spectrum at best.

Right it's dynamic and emergent. Almost like people naturally want to do "gender." It doesn't go away. Aren't gnc people doing "gender" as well? The more gnc they are the more they are doing "gender."

You seem to be mixing up "gender" with "gender stereotype". "Gender" is either of the two sexes (male and female) and was used as an alternative to "sex" (as that can reference sexual intercourse), "gender stereotype" as I've said before, it is just something observed in a group population and in the context about gender non-conformity, to identify and communicate a diversion from the stereotype. GNC people aren't doing "gender", "gender" is not performative, it's just "gender". GNC aren't "performing" anything, they just happen to not align with many of their own gender's stereotypes and care very little about gender stereotypes. What is "performative" are drag performances, deliberate, exaggeration of gender stereotypes performed for entertainment by the artist. You can say people are living up to their respective stereotypes of their OWN gender, there's no governing body to establish this, but from what I gather as a rule is if you don't act the same, dress the same as your respective gender stereotype, you're not conforming to the stereotype and therefore would be more accurately described as non-conforming.

Edit: Wording

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

You're going to have to show me this,

From the GenderCritical sticky.

Crossdressers/Drag Queens: Non-Transgender men who dress up as stereotypical women for entertainment or erotic purposes. GC are often critical towards this group because while touted as progressive they often use dehumanizing and negative stereotypes of women (Womanface).

https://saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/55iq/the_peakening_read_this_if_you_are_new_to_gender/

I wish the old debate sub hadn't been banned because there was plenty more chat there.

But really it's not difficult to find.

I asked them what they thought of /r/crossdressing and the disapproved of it.

It's not all about the trans identifying people.

The rejection of crossdressers, drag and femininity in men by sections of feminists was there before the modern trans politics was there.

Meghan Murphy was complaining about Harry Styles in a dress only recently.

http://web.archive.org/web/20201208221302/https://www.feministcurrent.com/2020/12/08/a-man-in-a-dress-is-not-inspiring-he-is-simply-a-man-in-a-dress/

Sure I agree with Murphy on the problem of Yanniv.

But as a crossdresser I'm going to defend crossdressing and crossdressers.

You're going to have to show me this, because from what I've seen they care more about deluded insecure creepy males then a bunch of non-deluded ones who are feminine cross-dressers who like to infiltrate women only spaces and can see through the TRA bullshit. I've read a lot of their reddit pages and I have been on their saidit from the very start. I interact with fellow GC there. I don't agree nor disagree that there're GC who hate feminine males,

You mean there is a possibility that a good chunk of gc hate femininity in men?

This means crossdressers are fetishists, drag queens are mocking and other things can be called appropriation.

Here's a question is masculinity and femininity sexual? Is it deeply connected to sexuality of people?

If sexuality is gendered what does gender non conforming sexuality look like?

but I have yet to see a lot or any posts that reflects the attitudes GC as a whole, have about feminine males. I haven't seen a single post where someone who has held an account and have been a regular GC visitor who has expressed this type of sentiment there before. GC target males who try to make everyone else accept their delusions, penalise them for not using their pronoun choice of the day (because no one cares and they can see it's a male), request or demand special treatment and want to invade female spaces.

It's pointless to deny crossdressers are connected to transwomen and the trans arena.

It's like it's pointless to deny the overlap between dyke identities and trans men. People from both communities exist with the trans community. There is travel.

I can see what gc has against crossdressing, any kind, from it's position.

But to me the agenda "lets abolish gender" doesn't work.

Complaining about feminine stereotypes whilst embodying masculine stereotypes isn't a great place to argue from.

At most, I have seen a lot that just blatantly hate the male race in general.

There is an amount of that.

This is Sheila Jefferys area. Do you see here as a significant gender critical.

Do you need more links?

You seem to be mixing up "gender" with "gender stereotype".

Well this is some of the fundamentals.

We, on all sides, in English, tend to mix up what we mean when we say gender. What it means, for everyone, depends on the context.

"Gender" is either of the two sexes (male and female) and was used as an alternative to "sex" (as that can reference sexual intercourse), "gender stereotype" as I've said before, it is just something observed in a group population and in the context about gender non-conformity, to identify and communicate a diversion from the stereotype.

Though stereotype is a pejorative word implying it's something people should not be.

Most people are conforming. By this way of thinking that's wrong. Stereotypes are wrong.

I guess this takes us to the idea of abolishing gender. But what does that mean?

GNC people aren't doing "gender", "gender" is not performative,

How? How have they escaped gender?

it's just "gender". GNC aren't "performing" anything, they just happen to not alignwith many of their own gender's stereotypes and care very little about gender stereotypes.

They have not escaped gender norms.

What is "performative" are drag performances, deliberate, exaggeration of gender stereotypes performed for entertainment by the artist.

So is a butch biker woman a deliberate exaggeration norms?

You can say people are living up to their respective stereotypes of their OWN gender, there's no governing body to establish this, but from what I gather as a rule is if you don't act the same, dress the same as your respective gender stereotype, you're not conforming to the stereotype and therefore would be more accurately described as non-conforming.

But no one, outside radical feminism, thinks they have escaped gender norms. Most people thinking they are doing a version of masculinity.

For most people that is fine. But it's not beyond gender.

By this reasoning why shouldn't everyone be gender non conforming like some gender critical women are.

Including men, what would that look like? Masculine men.