you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ZveroboyAlinaIs clownfish a clown or a fish? 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I've seen it made when gc wants to point to gender non conformity it approves of.

I don't understand what you mean here. Explain, please.

Which I don't think many people find realistic.

Does not make it not worth to name the problems of it and aim to fix them.

In general I'd compare it to sexual orientation. If orientation was like gender expression.

It absolutely different concepts. One is innate function and part of organism, which is seen among majority of mammals. And other is socially constructed system, which we can chose not to follow.

QT might say people ought to be free to have any orientation. At the same time they might accept someone linking their sexuality to their sex as a norm. It's contradictory if you think there are no natural links.

GC might say people ought to be free to have any orientation and that people ought to break the heterosexual normality. But it's unclear what that would mean. Would everyone be bisexual? Would there be equal gay and straight people?

That is mostly what homophobes were saying and often position of mainstream QT movement (thought I know many QT who disagree). "Everyone is pansexual" is promoted.

I'd also say orientation is strongly correlated to gender expression.

My older friends who lived in USSR said when they were out as lesbians, everyone was saying to them that they like "femininity", so they may like feminine presenting men. While in reality it is not the case. Heterosexual women can like masculine, feminine or androgynous men (and young boysbands are often composed from androgynous men, because they are not looking dangerous, so it is easier to lure teen girls to listen to them). Same goes to lesbians. Same goes to gay men.

When I was living in Russia I was told a lot that I love femininity and not females (I am bisexual, but I am FEBFem, so I was saying that I am lesbian, so men were not hitting for me that often) as well. QT's idea that people are "same-gender attracted" is very homophobic and is not new idea.

GC might say why would a straight crossdresser say that? Well because straight crossdressers are rarer. In surveys most crossdressers are at least bisexual. The majority are same sex attracted, or bi.

Your logic is going backwards here. I will try to be very clear in every step now:

  1. We are attracted to one sex.

  2. On that one sex society is imposing some stereotypes.

  3. We are unconciously entangling those stereotypes with that sex, because we are used to see it everywhere.

  4. When we see or hear that stereotype - we are thinking about that sex first, because we are used to think that way.

  5. If those stereotypes are big part of "what is attractive to opposite sex" enforced by society, then people of one sex will try follow stereotypes to be rewarded with being called attractive and having more success among opposite sex.

  6. So when bisexual or gay man want to attract more men - they may start cross-dressing, because dresses and skirts are what is magnetting attention of most men, as they are used to think that it is attractive. So even heterosexual men would give some attention to gay or bisexual men who are wearing such cloths. Having stereotypes and sex mixed in wrong order will make brains of people confused. Brains are working through samples, because brains are lazy, so when something uncommon occurs - brain is confused as it can't sort things instantly, and person have mixed feelings.

Here some random example:

Let's say women are all forced to wear hats, and no man is wearing hat - it was against the law for decades to be other way.

Gay man want more attention of other men - he puts hat on his head. Now heterosexual men are confused, because they see hat and under hat is not a woman, at the same time gay men seeing this man and thinking "if he want attention from men, this means he may be gay or bi". So it serves few purposes.

heterosexual cross-dresser

If it is not fetish or AGP - I am not sure why this can occur. What is the reasoning behind it? To run from gender norms and feel more free? Men aren't pressured that much, for this to happen often. I am interested.

I can understand why there are female cross-dressers - it is very common experience for women to want to escape gender roles imposed on us.

When I was a teen girl, I was trying to act manly, wear less revealing cloths and not take care of my face and hair, often to have dirty cloths - like boys do. I was doing this to escape attention of men, to escape the role I did not liked. When I was wearing a skirt - I was seeing all the hungry gazes, I was hearing all those jokes about me, I was seeing advertisements on TV - and I did not wanted to be associated with an object, I wanted to be a human being, like boys or men. Being "feminine" was making me feel like a lesser being. And it is why there always so many teen girls are trying to escape womanhood, and more misogynistic times - more of them appear.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

I don't understand what you mean here. Explain, please.

For instance a social conservative might say a man cooking the meals and woman working is a break down of gender norms.

GC might say "great this is a breakdown of gender norms."

But most people might say this isn't an end of gender, gender carries on and both these people are gender conforming.

It absolutely different concepts. One is innate function and part of organism, which is seen among majority of mammals. And other is socially constructed system, which we can chose not to follow.

You are saying men and women can happily choose to be gender conforming.

If you define both masculinity and femininity as absolute social constructions and femininity as oppression and masculinity as freedom then the logic is everyone should be masculine and gender would be abolished when everyone is masculine.

"Everyone is pansexual" is promoted.

I don't think "Everyone is pansexual" makes sense. I don't think "Everyone is gender non conforming" makes sense.

My older friends who lived in USSR said when they were out as lesbians, everyone was saying to them that they like "femininity", so they may like feminine presenting men. While in reality it is not the case

Of course I don't think that makes sense, I don't think that's how lesbians are.

Heterosexual women can like masculine, feminine or androgynous men (and young boysbands are often composed from androgynous men, because they are not looking dangerous, so it is easier to lure teen girls to listen to them).

But heterosexual women are likely to like masculine men. Heterosexual men are likely to like feminine women. That's a universal pattern. The minority of pattern breakers don't end that.

Same goes to lesbians. Same goes to gay men.

Where does the higher level of gender non conformity fit into the gay community there?

Let's say women are all forced to wear hats, and no man is wearing hat - it was against the law for decades to be other way.

Gay man want more attention of other men - he puts hat on his head.

OK I don't think this is how it works. I think feminine gay men want to express femininity irrespective of the interest from men.

Just as I think masculine gay women want to express some form masculinity irrespective of interest from women.

There IS a relationship between sexuality and expression but the expression comes first.

Are you saying expression is different for men and women?

Now heterosexual men are confused, because they see hat and under hat is not a woman, at the same time gay men seeing this man and thinking "if he want attention from men, this means he may be gay or bi". So it serves few purposes.

You are saying that heterosexual women are confused by masculine women and gay women think masculine women must want attention from women?

If it is not fetish or AGP - I am not sure why this can occur.

Right so you don't think femininity in straight men is a impossibility because femininity only exists to attract men?

You mean feminine gay women can't be attractive to gay women?

Another problem to with gc being for Blanchardian ideas is that they are very gender essentialist.

What is the reasoning behind it? To run from gender norms and feel more free? Men aren't pressured that much, for this to happen often.

Men are pressured to be masculine.

I am interested.

You mean why would a straight man crossdress?

I can understand why there are female cross-dressers - it is very common experience for women to want to escape gender roles imposed on us.

But you don't think anyone can be naturally attracted to expressing femininity in others. Man or woman?

When I was a teen girl, I was trying to act manly, wear less revealing cloths and not take care of my face and hair, often to have dirty cloths - like boys do. I was doing this to escape attention of men, to escape the role I did not liked. When I was wearing a skirt - I was seeing all the hungry gazes, I was hearing all those jokes about me, I was seeing advertisements on TV - and I did not wanted to be associated with an object, I wanted to be a human being, like boys or men. Being "feminine" was making me feel like a lesser being. And it is why there always so many teen girls are trying to escape womanhood, and more misogynistic times - more of them appear.

I mean I can see a woman wanting to escape that aggressive male attention.

At the same time same sex attraction is associated with gender non conformity. I don't think that is all about escaping male eyes.

As a bisexual you surely also want male attention at times and there are males attracted to masculine women.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaIs clownfish a clown or a fish? 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

For instance a social conservative might say a man cooking the meals and woman working is a break down of gender norms.

GC might say "great this is a breakdown of gender norms."

It can be the break of gender norms in some cultures, but only the beginning of it.

But most people might say this isn't an end of gender, gender carries on and both these people are gender conforming.

GC would not say it is the end of gender either, just first steps to.

You are saying men and women can happily choose to be gender conforming.

Gender conformity is rewarded, while gender non conformity is punished. So obviously some men and women will happily chose conformity.

If you define both masculinity and femininity as absolute social constructions and femininity as oppression and masculinity as freedom then the logic is everyone should be masculine and gender would be abolished when everyone is masculine.

Masculinity isn't freedom, but it is associated with more freedom.

"Everyone is pansexual" is promoted.

I don't think "Everyone is pansexual" makes sense. I don't think "Everyone is gender non conforming" makes sense.

But they are completely different concepts. Just because they both may make no sense - does not make them equal.

But heterosexual women are likely to like masculine men. Heterosexual men are likely to like feminine women. That's a universal pattern. The minority of pattern breakers don't end that.

You are failing on causality again. Heterosexual women are liking masculine men not because they are liking masculinity, but because masculinity is associated with men, masculinity is promoted as something that is attractive. Previously masculinity was wearing make-up and tight leggings - today it will be called feminine. Same with different cultures, masculine american may be recognized as feminine somewhere in India or Oceania, and masculine indian man in dress can be considered as feminine in USA. However, heterosexual women are still loving them, even thought they are looking the opposite.

Where does the higher level of gender non conformity fit into the gay community there?

I said in another answer to you this - gay men do not need to attract women, so they do not forced to follow more masculine presentation, as it becomes useless to them in this case. And they may want to attract male gazes, so they will more likely to have feminine presentation.

OK I don't think this is how it works. I think feminine gay men want to express femininity irrespective of the interest from men.

What you are saying that social masculinity and femininity is some genetical part of human behaviour. This makes no sense - as why then different cultures have different view on visual presentation of femininity and masculinity if it is innate?

There IS a relationship between sexuality and expression but the expression comes first.

No. Otherwise all cultures would had universal beauty standarts and universal femininity/masculinity descriptions.

Are you saying expression is different for men and women?

Reasons for it? Yes.

You are saying that heterosexual women are confused by masculine women and gay women think masculine women must want attention from women?

must

MAY want, not must want.

Right so you don't think femininity in straight men is a impossibility because femininity only exists to attract men?

That is what you saying, I never said or implied it. I am asking why you may have such urge to dres and look like a woman (which is not the same as to perform femininity). I am interested what can be a reason to conform to gender stereotypes of opposite sex when not being transgender, not being fetishist (as femininity is entangled with "being sexually attractive") and other similar reasons. I am not denying that there are other reasons for this, but I don't know them. And if you are one of those cases - I am interested to hear your position.

You mean feminine gay women can't be attractive to gay women?

???

Another problem to with gc being for Blanchardian ideas is that they are very gender essentialist.

Elaborate this point.

Men are pressured to be masculine.

So you want to escape this, but escape by going into opposite oppressive group?

You mean why would a straight man crossdress?

Yes, the one without sexual fetishes, and without being gender non conforming most of the time (as cross-dressing implies it is part-time activity, not permanent).

But you don't think anyone can be naturally attracted to expressing femininity in others. Man or woman?

I don't understand the question in that context.

I mean I can see a woman wanting to escape that aggressive male attention.

At the same time same sex attraction is associated with gender non conformity. I don't think that is all about escaping male eyes.

As a bisexual you surely also want male attention at times and there are males attracted to masculine women.

Not really, I went fully FEBFem way. I can find men attractive, but I would not want to date any, or any to give me attention.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Gender conformity is rewarded, while gender non conformity is punished. So obviously some men and women will happily chose conformity.

But all men and women who conform don't consider themselves choosing to conform to avoid punishment.

Masculinity isn't freedom, but it is associated with more freedom.

This point I kind of agree on. Traditionally men the masculine role is associated with a higher degree of power and freedom.

Where it comes into problems is trying to apply the traditional situation in modern times. More freedom has not meant an end to gender.

I would take essentialist reasons for that.

You are failing on causality again. Heterosexual women are liking masculine men not because they are liking masculinity, but because masculinity is associated with men, masculinity is promoted as something that is attractive. Previously masculinity was wearing make-up and tight leggings - today it will be called feminine. Same with different cultures, masculine american may be recognized as feminine somewhere in India or Oceania, and masculine indian man in dress can be considered as feminine in USA. However, heterosexual women are still loving them, even thought they are looking the opposite.

Gender expression and roles change but gender remains.

And they can only change within limits.

When heels were popular with men they associated with the power of owning a warhorse an expensive thing connected to power. I can't deny that relationship still exists in masculinity today. To power and violence.

And in some complications heels today can be associated with power and wealth.

So I do think gender expression does vary it never goes away. I think of it as a kind of sexual display like animals do. That explains a lot to me.

All the different cultures still have gender expression and gender norms. Plus a minority of gender non conforming people associated with same sex attraction.

I said in another answer to you this - gay men do not need to attract women, so they do not forced to follow more masculine presentation, as it becomes useless to them in this case. And they may want to attract male gazes, so they will more likely to have feminine presentation.

But gay men find masculine men attractive. This places all the desire on the men. Gay women can kind find feminine women attractive.

All of femininity is not down to male desire.

What you are saying that social masculinity and femininity is some genetical part of human behaviour. This makes no sense - as why then different cultures have different view on visual presentation of femininity and masculinity if it is innate?

I think language is innate but completed by culture. The same with gender.

I think gender expression is related to sexual display. That seems a perfectly natural parallel to sexual orientation.

I can't imagine sexual display would be the same.

No. Otherwise all cultures would had universal beauty standarts and universal femininity/masculinity descriptions.

Different but never the same.

I am asking why you may have such urge to dres and look like a woman (which is not the same as to perform femininity). I am interested what can be a reason to conform to gender stereotypes of opposite sex when not being transgender, not being fetishist (as femininity is entangled with "being sexually attractive") and other similar reasons.

It's a mix of expression and eroticism. You might call that a fetish but I have different interpretation than gc. I don't think you can disconnect gender expression from sex. If you take erotic popular with straight women and flip the sexes that would work for me.

But that would be described as fetishistic.

I am not denying that there are other reasons for this, but I don't know them. And if you are one of those cases - I am interested to hear your position.

I think this is part of the problem that gc can't imagine healthy reasons for straight male gender non conformity. If it sees sexualization of femininity it's always going to see that as wrong. Where as it doesn't see the sexualization of masculinity as a problem.

But to me masculinity and femininity are naturally sexual.

They are also not perfect mirrors of each other.

You mean feminine gay women can't be attractive to gay women?

???

Women can find the femininity of women attractive.

That's natural.

Elaborate this point.

Autogynephilia is part of Blanchards model.

It relies on an essentialist model that is as odds with gender critical.

"Male attracted trans women are naturally feminine"

"Female attracted trans women are attracted to themselves"

It's usually extended to women to say

"Female attracted trans men are naturally masculine"

"Female attracted trans men are attracted to themselves"

Gender expression in this model is natural.

So you want to escape this, but escape by going into opposite oppressive group?

That's more political than where my desires starts. The desire to crossdress started before I was a teenager. I never used porn growing up. I was mostly disconnected from sexuality.

I want to express femininity and I'm attracted to dominant women.

I'm not choosing that to escape. I'd rather not have this identity.

Yes, the one without sexual fetishes, and without being gender non conforming most of the time (as cross-dressing implies it is part-time activity, not permanent).

I mean not being able to express yourself as you wish is source of distress.

Not really, I went fully FEBFem way. I can find men attractive, but I would not want to date any, or any to give me attention.

AH right I see what you mean.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaIs clownfish a clown or a fish? 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But all men and women who conform don't consider themselves chossing to conform to avoid punishment.

Of course, most of conformity is coming by it being passively enforced and normalized. It happened in USSR and nazi Germany, when just in span of 10-15 years, normal and kind people started doing atrocities and thinking it is fine and kind thing to do. Many were not afraiding of punishment, they did not even know there will be punishment if they go out of line.

This point I kind of agree on. Traditionally men the masculine role is associated with a higher degree of power and freedom.

Where it comes into problems is trying to apply the traditional situation in modern times. More freedom has not meant an end to gender.

I was not saying it is the end of gender. I just explained why this is happening.

And I know some men who are gender non conforming because they do not want to get extra privileges. Society is pushing them to be successful and they don't want to, they want calm chill life, equal to people around. It is still different from that society is pushing women to not be successful.

When heels were popular with men they associated with the power of owning a warhorse an expensive . A connection to power. I can't deny that relationship still exists in masculinity today. To power and violence.

So I do think gender expression does vary it never goes away. I think of it as a kind of sexual display like animals do. That explains a lot to me.

The point of that part was about different thing, thought. It was about sexuality, that we are not attracted to gender expression, because if women were attracted before to high heels - they are not anymore. So if we were attracted to gender expression - then women would still be liking men in high heels and tight leggings. That is what I was explaining, that we see gender expression attractive ONLY because it is currently associated with the sex we are attracted to. Gender expression is just an easy and socially created indicator of someone's sex and position.

But gay men find masculine men attractive. This places all the desire on the men. Gay women can kind find feminine women attractive.

Obviously, and not "can" or "some", majority of them will. They are loving men for being men and loving women for being women. Gender non conformity among them I already explained, thought. It is because you do not need to attract opposite sex anymore and you understand your own sex better than you understand opposite. And second reason is to show that you are searching attention from your own sex. Plus in general, homosexuality already breaking the norms, as it is uncommon. If you are breaking one norm - it is easier to break more norms, because people already see you as one who is breaking norms. This makes this social pressure of gender lighter on homosexual people.

All of femininity is not down to male desire.

Most of promoted is, thought. To looks sexy and young. Almost all ads are about it.

I think language is innate but completed by culture. The same with gender.

Not really. Gender often goes against sex traits and limits traits which are equal among both sexes. There is reasoning while men are more agressive and sexually more perverted (mostly androgenic hormones, but not just them and hormones not main reason), and some behaviours of women are dictated by fear - men are much stronger and agressive, so we (women) are limiting some our behaviours or behaving differently with men around. It is mostly all boiling down to physical differences, but it is more social again. In "perfect society" women would not afraid men, so those behaviours would dissapear.

I think gender expression is related to sexual display. That seems a perfectly natural parallel to sexual orientation.

I can't imagine sexual display would be the same.

It is secondary, not primary reason, thought.

Different but never the same.

Sometimes it is. And sometimes it is opposite. Men from Wodaabe tribe in Africa are doing all the "female work" and wearing make up, dresses, dancing, when trying to impress women, who are in power there. So femininity there is "having power", for example. In some OCE islands it was similar, mostly because those islands were very isolated, and they understand that if most or all women die - they will not be able to reproduce anymore and will vanish out of existence, while if women survive - then tribe will survive, even if all men will die, as they can (and were) make kids with a random sailors sailing nearby.

It's a mix of expression and eroticism. You might call that a fetish but I have different interpretation than gc. I don't think you can disconnect gender expression from sex. If you take erotic popular with straight women and flip the sexes that would work for me.

GC don't have interpretation for regular cross-dressers, most GC are concerned with AGP mostly. Transvestic fetishes can be issue, but only because Stonewall and GLAAD are pushing "cross-dressing" as "being transgender" and "same as being woman, so they allowed in female sports and spaces".

But that would be described as fetishistic.

If fetishes are not harming other people, there nothing bad in them in general.

I think this is part of the problem that gc can't imagine gender health reasons for straight male gender non conformity.

You are mixing gender non conformity and "trying to look like opposite sex". We can understand gender non conformity for males and females, most of GC are gender non conforming themselves.

If it sees sexualization of femininity it's always going to see that as wrong.

In most cases it is, thought. Gender non conforming males who were not afraid to call themselves males were shown as good examples of gender ideology being bullshit by GC feminists, for example. Even misogynist ContraPoints was respected for proudly calling himself a man and a male, who just likes dresses and make up. ContraPoints was like that for very long time, until recently decided to delete all old videos and transition to transwoman.

Where as it doesn't see the sexualization of masculinity as a problem.

That is not true. GC feminists see this as a problem, but it is not feminism problem. Male GC can see this as problem, I know many gay men and even transsexuals who have GC views and see this as a problem. It is just not that a problem in context of trans lobby taking away rights of women and harming homosexual kids.

But to me masculinity and femininity are naturally sexual.

I don't see people naturally sexual, thought. However, gender stereotypes are often sexual, that is true. But that is one of their goals to be sexual.

Autogynephilia is part of Blanchards model.

It relies on an essentialist model that is as odds with gender critical.

You are understanding it wrong. Gender expression there is secondary. AGP are attracted to imagining themselves as being sexually attractive stereotypical woman. And main anchors of sexuality in society is "toxic femininity" or "toxic masculinity".

That model just showing distinctions between those two groups who want to transition. One groups are transitioning because either they are tired of homophobia (even if it is unconsciously) or they want to catfish heterosexual men, other group are doing this because they went too deep into their fetishes and sexual arousal of themselves being perceived as women. That is why first group wants to live very silently, blend with regular women and not demanding any extra rights, and why second group is so loud and want everyone to focus on them, how good or sexy they are, how special they are.

That's more political that my desires starts. The desire to crossdress started before I was a teenager. I never used porn growing up. I was mostly disconnected from sexuality.

I want to express femininity and I'm attracted to dominant women.

I'm not choosing that to escape. I'd rather not have this identity.

I see.

I mean not being able to express yourself as you wish is source of distress.

That's why second wave feminism was promoting gender non conformity among women so much (and with glam metal and glam rock such idea was pushed among men too) - especially considering that majority of "classic" or "typical" women's cloths is very uncomfortable to work or sometimes to just walk.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

And I know some men who are gender non conforming because they do not want to get extra privileges.

Are you sure? They actively reject masculinity in order to avoid privileges? Or are they just burned out from over work?

Yes over work might be related to masculinity but if that's the only aspect of masculinity they are rejecting it doesn't sound like a rejection of masculinity.

Are they wearing dresses to avoid the privilege of masculinity?

It was about sexuality, that we are not attracted to gender expression, because if women were attracted before to high heels - they are not anymore. Gender expression is just an easy and socially created indicator of someone's sex and position.

But people still are sexually attracted to gender expression today. They had dimorphic gender expression back at that time too. It wasn't heels and leggings for men and women. Women had a whole other form of gender expression. If heels and leggings are part of misogyny now were they not when men wore something like that?

If heels and leggings became the norm for masculinity would non conforming women adopt them? I expect they would. Such is the nature of non conformity.

Gender non conformity among them I already explained, thought. It is because you do not need to attract opposite sex anymore and you understand your own sex better than you understand opposite.

Doesn't this place all of "gender" on attraction? That masculinity only exists because women find it attractive and femininity only exists because men find it attractive?

I think masculinity and femininity are social activities expressed by a person and sought by others. It's a social construction like language that comes naturally, like language.

And second reason is to show that you are searching attention from your own sex.

Well I mean I kind of agree. That seems perfectly normal and natural. Gender expression as sexual display. Masculinity is a sexual display.

Here's the thing though a person who is non conforming will find that "pressure to conform to please the opposite sex" more strongly. They will feel that contrast. Whereas conforming people won't feel that.

Plus in general, homosexuality already breaking the norms, as it is uncommon. If you are breaking one norm - it is easier to break more norms, because people already see you as one who is breaking norms.

I just don't believe this. Why would a gay person want to break norms EVEN more? When doing so is socially dangerous?

All of femininity is not down to male desire.

Most of promoted is, though. To looks sexy and young. Almost all ads are about it.

Of course I would think masculinity and femininity are sexy. Are you saying masculinity is down to the female gaze? People use its inherent attraction to sell other things. Selling isn't creating the attraction.

There is reasoning while men are more agressive and sexually more perverted (mostly androgenic hormones, but not just them and hormones not main reason), and some behaviours of women are dictated by fear - men are much stronger and agressive, so we (women) are limiting some our behaviours or behaving differently with men around. It is mostly all boiling down to physical differences, but it is more social again. In "perfect society" women would not afraid men, so those behaviours would dissapear.

I'm confused here. Are you saying men ARE more naturally aggressive than women?

I think this might be the case, but I'm more essentialist than most here. I accept there are natural behaviour and physical differences between men and women. Male aggression might be one of them and that creates the differences we see in society. Not just culture or physical differences.

For example criminality. I think men in all cultures, in almost all kinds of crime, in all eras are more likely to be criminal. That might be linked to a basic higher level of aggression. One attribute that has multiple effects across behaviours. So society can't be "perfected" to the point that men and women have equal behaviour profiles across all people.

Men from Wodaabe tribe in Africa are doing all the "female work" and wearing make up, dresses, dancing, when trying to impress women, who are in power there.

They are a fascinating culture. But are they "dresses?" I'm Scottish, kilts aren't judged as feminine. In fact they are judged as masculine, associated with the highland warrior iconography, which is hyper masculine.

A starting point about the Wadaabe is they still have gender norms.

Women choosing from among men trying to impress them is not the end of gender. Women select from among men trying to impress them within Western culture. Sexual selection carries on.

Is the beauty of Geerewol contest considered feminine? Or is it masculine beauty?

GC don't have interpretation for regular cross-dressers, most GC are concerned with AGP mostly.

I mean to me this is symbolic.

GC has problems justifying femininity at all. In that sense it becomes an argument for everyone to be masculine.

But most people in the world, men or women, don't accept that.

Transvestic fetishes can be issue, but only because Stonewall and GLAAD are pushing "cross-dressing" as "being transgender" and "same as being woman, so they allowed in female sports and spaces".

I think they have more issues with them than that.

I often think "crossdressers" are doing precisely the things that antagonise gender critical feminists the most.

The things they like across the spectrum are things that gc dislike most about the stereotypes about women. GC doesn't like those kinds of women.

But then I think gc doesn't seem masculinity in women as endorsing any stereotypes about men. But people outside of gc see masculinity in masculine women as expression of stereotypes.

If fetishes are not harming other people, there nothing bad in them in general.

But I think gc still disapproves of people finding femininity attractive.

I don't see people naturally sexual, thought. However, gender stereotypes are often sexual, that is true. But that is one of their goals to be sexual.

But it seems unavoidable. Masculinity is sexual. Femininity is sexual. I don't see how you can have society without that. I don't think populations are going to have unisex sexuality. Gender variation is going to carry on being a minority, often only noticeable in large populations.

You are mixing gender non conformity and "trying to look like opposite sex". We can understand gender non conformity for males and females, most of GC are gender non conforming themselves.

But "non conformity" surely just means cross conformity. They aren't inventing something entirely new. They are tuning in on either masculinity or feminininity.

Gender non conforming males who were not afraid to call themselves males were shown as good examples of gender ideology being bullshit by GC feminists, for example.... ContraPoints was respected for proudly calling himself a man and a male, who just likes dresses and make up. ContraPoints was like that for very long time, until recently decided to delete all old videos and transition to transwoman.

When ContraPoints said they were a crossdresser and it was all due to personality and personal choice I was in disagreement.

Because they are choosing the norms, "the stereotypes of women" if you will. They haven't made this up. They have some desire to express that femininity. I'd stress though that does not mean they need to identify as a woman. But I can see how a person would.

The same is true of masculinity in women. There doesn't seem much point in denying gnc people aren't focusing in on tropes of the opposite sex.

Now sure if half of all men and women stopped following gender norms, or if androgyny became the norm for everyone I'd agree social gender had gone. But it doesn't happen. In liberal nations, people carry on doing gender. They seem to enjoy it. While a minority carry on at odds with it.

Gender expression there is secondary. AGP are attracted to imagining themselves as being sexually attractive stereotypical woman. And main anchors of sexuality in society is "toxic femininity" or "toxic masculinity".

But what's counting as "toxic femininity" or "toxic masculinity" here? Who is doing the toxic femininity and toxic masculinity?

That model just showing distinctions between those two groups who want to transition. One groups are transitioning because either they are tired of homophobia (even if it is unconsciously) or they want to catfish heterosexual men,

That is not entirely the model.

The Blanchard model says the "gay male transsexual" is naturally feminine.

other group are doing this because they went too deep into their fetishes and sexual arousal of themselves being perceived as women. That is why first group wants to live very silently, blend with regular women and not demanding any extra rights, and why second group is so loud and want everyone to focus on them, how good or sexy they are...

I really don't think that is a realistic description either. I do think there are unreasonable, bad trans activists but the generalizations are not good descriptions overall. I think you have to distinguish between activists

But besides that I think the Blanchard model hits all kinds of other problems. It's not that the behaviours aren't there it has too many holes, too many exceptions, too much double think.

That's why second wave feminism was promoting gender non conformity among women so much...

I don't think glam metal or the new romantics were an end of gender. It was a theatrical rock and a club subculture. Gender carried on. Men as a population did not take to glam rock, it was a small movement.

Plenty of male clothes are uncomfortable and plenty of "male" activities are uncomfortable. That doesn't stop people wanting to do them.

I'm not a fan of violent contact sports and fanatical support but it's judged a reasonable part of masculinity.