you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]CuteAsDuck[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    I don't think that's misunderstanding the articles. They may not directly say gay men have female brains, but by emphasizing on gay men's brains being similar to women's brains in structure when all brains are similar in structure to a degree regardless of sex, the articles along with their "scientists" are homophobic, intend on giving the impression gay men are "psychologically women" or "straight women trapped in male bodies" or things similar. Homophobes know their way with words. To lure an audience, they hide behind certain conclusions, such as "gay men have similar brains to straight women", indirectly saying that "gay men have female brains" while playing with words.

    The sources, and the experiments of the articles you defend are homophobic indeed, as you say so in your response to my question in your second line.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]CuteAsDuck[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      The researchers over-emphasised the neurological similarities between homosexuals and heterosexuals of the opposite sex

      Because they are homophobic, aren't actually researchers, and did indirectly do that "research" so others make the leap from "brains of gay men are similar to brains of straight women" to "gay men are just women in male bodies" or "gay men have female brains". Otherwise, there was no point in emphasizing those similarities when the brains of everyone is similar to a degree ...

      [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      So why ask us to confirm it’s homophobic and regressive thinking?