you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yep. It’s insensitive

[–]SnowAssMan 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Some people don't believe that it's insensitive, therefore you can't say it's insensitive, since your philosophy prevents you from saying anything that isn't 100% true, 100% of the time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No I can say something’s insensitive, but it’s just my subjective opinion

[–]SnowAssMan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Scientific consensus > subjective opinion, therefore humans are bipeds & sex is binary, no amount of variety within dimorphism nor mismatches between chromosomes & phenotypes can alter that, because gonads & gametes are never ambiguous – which is what sex refers to, as it's integral to sexual reproduction.