GC: Why are penises, testes, etc considered strictly male organs, and vaginas, uteruses, etc strictly female organs? What's wrong with the view that women have penises, etc too and can produce sperm, or that men have vaginas, uteruses, etc too and can get pregnant?

submitted by BubblyBrush from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I believe in gender abolition and identify as a gender critical feminist. I just also happen to support trans rights.

[–]BubblyBrush[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What? If you were gender critical, you wouldn't talk exactly like the trans right activists do: "uwu binary sex doesn't exist, if you have no gametes or genitals you're sexless uwu?".

GC at its core criticizes trans right activists and their beliefs, and if you are a trans right activist then you're contradicting yourself.

You said you 'identify' as a GC, if you were GC you would know it doesn't matter what you identify as. What matters is if you are really GC or not, and seeing as you don't at all follow the core values of GC, you are not GC.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I disagree. Just as there can be TIRFs there can be TIGCFs. You’re definition of GC feminism as entirely based on trans rights with no other areas of concern is nonsensical. Plus foolish bigotry will never be a legitimate part of any branch of feminism, so I consider myself more of a gender critical feminist than almost anyone else on this sub

[–]BubblyBrush[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If GC means being a trans right activist then I will have to use "Anti-TRA and anti-GC:" when asking my questions so you know I'm specifically asking questions from "bigots uwu", and not you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But I’m neither anti trans rights or anti gc, I’m just anti transphobia. Maybe use “pro transphobia” and “anti transphobia”?

[–]BubblyBrush[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good one, "pro-transphobia" works better than "anti-tra and anti-GC".