QT: What do you think about the AGP model and posts that are documented in itsafetish?

submitted by [deleted] from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

having AGP makes them form emotional attachments to the idea of being a real woman somehow and if they acknowledge their AGP, it means that they’re not.

This is really insightful and explains a lot, thanks.

I feel like everyone here is at least like transmed.

While I'm glad of this, it's something that I'd like to understand better. From what I can see, the transmedicalist view is on the basis of the dysphoria first and foremost? Is this correct? I've seen self-admitted AGPs on askAGP expressing that they have severe dysphoria. According to them, AGP can cause dysphoria that is severe enough that people want to transition and it sometimes provides genuine relief. Of course, this is self-admitted, and many of the types that seem to wreak havoc are emotionally tied to not admitting it (as you say.)

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, transmedicalism says you can't be trans if you don't have dysphoria. AGPs say they have dysphoria from being AGP, but I don't know if transmeds agree on whether that is valid or not. Anecdotally, I feel like AGPs who admit their AGP seem to be more considerate and less prone to hurt others (like you say). I feel like ending self-ID and having more gatekeeping might reduce the numbers of AGPs who transition or maybe AGPs could be taught to deal with it some other way. I really do worry about safety because some AGPs are predatory letting them transition puts women and trans people in harms way. I feel like there are no easy answers. :(