you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]divingrightintowork 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

and believe that there is an objective reality that we all share.

You left out how the current trans movement is pretty much founded on constructivism, which I'm guessing you don't vibe with either - now ask me some questions to figure out if I'm trans positive or not! (I mean, if you want).

But for real sounds like we could get on ok enough and I'm glad you wandered over here, your post made me smile / laugh.

[–]catoborosnonbinary 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks! My views are a hybrid of evolutionary biology and constructivism: each faction has part of the elephant, but could learn more by combining their perspectives. Human beings are too complicated for simplistic reductionism.

My question: what is your opinion on JK Rowling's opinion piece on sex an gender issues?

[–]divingrightintowork 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hrm it looks like she may have replaced "Terf Wars" With that article and they're overall fairly similar?

[–]catoborosnonbinary 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, I am not sure.

My take on her piece is that, while I disagree with some of her points and think some are transphobic, I do not think she is hateful, and I support her right to freedom of expression. While she seems to have compassion for trans women, I do not consider someone who wants to keep trans women out of women's spaces to be trans positive.