Does GC feminism include trans men?

submitted by GenderbenderShe/her/hers from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

That' s not what you said. You said that trans men are not female.

Socially they are not. They are men.

If you acknowledge that not all sex characteristics can be changed, then you should understand that those characteristics that can' t be changed and come from female biology are what we focus on when we say we include trans natal females in our activism and why they are female.

That's like a feminist using albeist slurs and then claiming to include disabled people. I am learning disabled.

Great, then they can stay as far away as they want. We are not forcing them to join us, and we are not forcing them to use whatever right radical feminism fights for.

They do with GC feeling sorry for them and calling them handmaidens.

It' s called "I like men who present as men and don' t like men who present as women".

Which is heterosexuality.

Heterosexuality means being attracted to the opposite sex. Being attracted to both sexes is bisexuality.

So people are actually attracted to uterus and prostates and chromosomes and not bodies?

No. Liking someone' s gender presentation is not sexual orientation, it' s a preference. And most people care more about the body of the person who "presents" as one gender or the other than the presentation. That means that a straight man might mistake another man for a woman if he passes well enough and could find him attractive, but the second he learns that the guy in question still has a penis, he' s going to stop being attracted and interested. Unless he' s bisexual.

It is a sexual orientation. By the way I said I am not attracted to vaginas so if he has a vagina I will not date him but am willing to do sexual things with him that don't involve his vagina.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Socially they are not. They are men.

Then you shouldn' t have have used the word "female". I don' t share the idiocy that woman and man are terms that refer to social presentation, but you didn' t use those, you used "female".

You are so full of it it' s ridicoulous.

That's like a feminist using albeist slurs and then claiming to include disabled people. I am learning disabled.

Cool, then those horribly mistreated "men" should stay away from us and should stop, voluntarily, benefit from anything radical feminists and GCers have ever gained for women. That will show us!!!!

They do with GC feeling sorry for them and calling them handmaidens.

They can and should keep doing it . We won' t stop saying that lots of them are transitioning for internalized misogyny or because some of them are handmaiden.

Which is heterosexuality.

No, it' s bisexuality.

So people are actually attracted to uterus and prostates and chromosomes and not bodies?

Bodies are female or male according to their sex. If you get body mods to pretend that you are a member of the other sex, then you might confuse someone if you pass very well. The second a straight man finds out that the "woman" he finds hot has a dick or used to have a dick, however, it' s done.

It is a sexual orientation.

No.

By the way I said I am not attracted to vaginas so if he has a vagina I will not date him but am willing to do sexual things with him that don't involve his vagina.

Still bisexuality.

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Then you shouldn' t have have used the word "female". I don' t share the idiocy that woman and man are terms that refer to social presentation, but you didn' t use those, you used "female".

I said female, not assigned female at birth.

Cool, then those horribly mistreated "men" should stay away from us and should stop, voluntarily, benefit from anything radical feminists and GCers have ever gained for women. That will show us!!!!

They did a long time ago. BTW, not all radfems are GC. GC is a branch of radical feminism.

They can and should keep doing it . We won' t stop saying that lots of them are transitioning for internalized misogyny or because some of them are handmaiden.

Then your feminism doesn't include trans men, instead it actively promotes bigotry against trans men.

No, it' s bisexuality.

Most people disagree with you.

Bodies are female or male according to their sex. If you get body mods to pretend that you are a member of the other sex, then you might confuse someone if you pass very well. The second a straight man finds out that the "woman" he finds hot has a dick or used to have a dick, however, it' s done.

I know many straight men who wouldn't do that.

[–]yishengqingwa666 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are laughably ignorant and really quite boring. Goodbye.

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So are you.