you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zephyranthes 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How did you come to enough of an understanding of what it's like to be trans to feel that you can appropriately contribute to the discussion?

This makes no sense. Specifically, when you wade through the newspeak, it means "you aren't qualified to debate if you don't already agree with me".

Unlike being of the female sex, being trans is self-identification with a movement. Honest members of a movement naturally consider themselves to be in the right. Therefore, they must EITHER define satisfactory understanding as agreement OR admit that they are in fact enemies of the outgroup. So which is it?

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

being trans is self-identification with a movement

Can you explain what you mean by this? I feel like we can not support the movement, but still be trans because I guess I see trans as meaning physically transitioned.