you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tamingthemindradfem (GC) 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is a good point that people can often forget - not all GC people are radfems, but all radfems are GC.

[–]MezozoicGaygay male 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

radfems

This recent division on neo-liberal, liberal and radical feminism (and 10 more feminisms) is weird for me. Liberal feminism of second wave was radical enough to demand changes in laws. I am not a woman to judge, but still.

Isn't any feminism that want changes for women - already radical to a degree and goes against current power situation in the world?

And if feminism does not want to change system, but just empower only few women (neo liberal one, for example) - is it feminism at all if it plays along the oppressors?