you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jizera 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So we have another event of the never ending "debate" about definitions. But the trans-ideology is not mathematics or other exact science and sex, gender, man, woman, male, female trans woman, trans man are not matematical concepts. The central trans-creed "trans women are women / trans men are men" is not relating trans women and trans men to some definition of the woman and man. Non-transsexual people should actually read the trans-creed as a commandment "You shall treat, address and accept a trans woman as a woman and a trans man as a man". For transsexual people this "creed" is only expression of their unrealizable desire, what they mask by using the foggy concepts of gender or gender identity. The gender identity is actually only expressing that the person identifies with the opposite sex; there is no other factual content of that concept. There is no possible "definition" of woman and man which is unrelated to roles in reproduction. We distinguish women from men because of the way how we reproduce. If we reproduced like slugs (by the way it is very intersting see the Wikipedia article Reproductive system of gastropods) there would be no men and women, only human beings.