Freedom of speech doesn't mean...
submitted 3 years ago by Tom9152🤬📢#@! from (i.imgur.com)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Without knowing the details, this case is hard to judge. Defamation is not protected by free speech and this sounds like defamation against Muhammad. I also think that defamation of a religion is indirect defamation of members of the religion. And if this teacher taught in a publicly funded school, that makes this even worse. Note that I am not Muslim and that I strongly support free speech. Before America became a leftist cesspool, it had my ideal of free speech and that included state anti-blasphemy laws with the understanding that blasphemy is simply defamation of religion.
[–]Tom9152🤬📢#@![S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Defamation is not protected by free speech
It should be
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
It isn't defamation when certain parts of a religion are provably wrong.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Censorship is worse than hate speech.
Reporting someone can get you banned.
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom9152🤬📢#@![S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)