Romania Passes Law Banning Gender Studies, Following Hungary and Poland

submitted by useless_aether from nationalfile.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]comments 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

why we let them get away with it

we spent the whole time making fun of them and doing the equivalent of posting on /s/cringeanarchy instead of actually taking care of things like we were supposed to. "ooooh don't worry they're not a real threat".

Also we genuinely value the freedom of speech and exploration. How exactly do you say something "isn't real academics?" Somebody chose those people to be faculty, does that mean people have to admit they did something wrong? Is it really not academic when compared to other humanities stuff? Did people just get obsessed with uplifting people because they thought they had too much and wanted to share? Did people get duped? Did people get arrogant? Did people get too novelty-seeking?

eta: I was censored here on SaidIt without explanation

[–]twosheds 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'd say identity studies aren't real academics by virtue of lacking rigor, lacking consistent models, and being unable to do studies that produce reproducible results. At best identity studies is a laundry list of gripes, with associated labels. Even soft sciences and humanities try to be something other than pure opinion, they do more than create mere labels and pretend it is useful knowledge.

Your point about us not taking the radicals seriously is a valid critique of American culture. We thought radicalized students would grow out of it because that was what used to happen.

[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd say identity studies aren't real academics by virtue of lacking rigor, lacking consistent models, and being unable to do studies that produce reproducible results. At best identity studies is a laundry list of gripes, with associated labels. Even soft sciences and humanities try to be something other than pure opinion, they do more than create mere labels and pretend it is useful knowledge.

well, idk about rigor, there have been some studies done about transgender stuff... though honestly this transgender stuff is what made me kinda start to question science more because it really just doesn't seem right to me even if the numbers are there. and there has afaik been anthropological work done in other cultures and in western subcultures, that's just descriptive and can be plenty rigorous.

I never really took the identity stuff for humanities (though one humanities class I took I later remembered when reading lists of subversive frankfurt school authors.) so I don't really know what's in there and how it compares to other humanities stuff.

eta: I was censored here on SaidIt without explanation