use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
RESOURCES
British 5G towers are being set on fire because of coronavirus conspiracy theories
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from theverge.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (6 children)
Ah, yes, but the owners of 5G antennas and equipment want to do grievous bodily harm to you, me and the entire populace. Have you not read up on 5G? An attorney might argue that the antennae destroyers were acting in self-defense.
[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
It's up to prove that 5G signals do any harm. As far as the government knows, the only thing they do to a human body is warm it up slightly.
Do you have any proof or data showing otherwise?
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (4 children)
No, but a few hundred scientists have gone on record saying that 5G is dangerous. Scientists do not usually make wild, unsubstantiated claims because they often depend on the government for grants to continue their research. That should hold you for a while. The 60 GigaHertz band is particularly dangerous because it prevents the uptake of oxygen into red blood cells. Victims die because there is no oxygen to their brain and other organs. Those people you saw fall over suddenly in Wuhan had precisly that problem. No, it's not up to me to prove anything. It is up to the government and the companies that make the equipment, many of them chinese, to prove that their equipment is not designed to harm humans on purpose. In congrssional hearings the US company that makes some of the equipment admitted that zero studies had been done by them on 5G to show that it was not harmful to humans. You can see the congressional hearings on YouTube. Here is a good site to get information on 5G and its effects on humans: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBizESL5Wcvcxs2eB6h0txQ/videos
She shows parts of the congressional hearings and much more.
[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
No,
There you go.
a few hundred scientists have gone on record
Point me to a few.
60 GigaHertz band is particularly dangerous because it prevents the uptake of oxygen into red blood cells had precisly that problem.
60 GigaHertz band is particularly dangerous because it prevents the uptake of oxygen into red blood cells
had precisly that problem.
More unsubstantiated claims. Provide evidence or cease spreading bullshit.
No, it's not up to me to prove anything. zero studies had been done on 5G
No, it's not up to me to prove anything.
zero studies had been done on 5G
Yes it is. My belief is that non-ionizing radiation at telecommunication levels is not harmful. Same as the status quo's.
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Hey, look it up yourself. Watch the video I linked. I am not responsible for your ignorance.
[–]danuker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
First of all, you edited your comment and added a CHANNEL, NOT A VIDEO, while I was replying. That is dishonest.
Second of all, you have not addressed any of my comments in the comment.
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
I added a channel for you because I want you to see her work. Dishonest? But I did not change the text. I just posted a link to conspiracy that you might like.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (6 children)
[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]danuker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)