British 5G towers are being set on fire because of coronavirus conspiracy theories

submitted by [deleted] from (theverge.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

I deny that I have incited anyone to violence. However 5G is violence to all except those lucky few off the grid. So I am assuming that you are also a potential victim. I have never and will never try to encourage violence against anyone. Killing a man is a helluva thing. You take away all he has and all he ever will have.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Violence:

behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

I deny that I have incited anyone to violence

but you said earlier:

burn, baby, burn

5G is violence

How exactly? Going against the government implies you have to provide evidence.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Yes, I said, "if we can assure that no one is harmed, then burn baby burn." That is a paraphrase. Why take my words out of context? That is not playing fair. IMO, you have lost credibility. What does your username mean? The Nuker?

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

If you set fire to something, you're causing at least financial harm to its owner.

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Ah, yes, but the owners of 5G antennas and equipment want to do grievous bodily harm to you, me and the entire populace. Have you not read up on 5G? An attorney might argue that the antennae destroyers were acting in self-defense.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's up to prove that 5G signals do any harm. As far as the government knows, the only thing they do to a human body is warm it up slightly.

Do you have any proof or data showing otherwise?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's up to governments to prove that 5G is harmless with transparent open science and they have utterly failed to do so WORLD WIDE.

Blind faith in the dogma that is corporate privatized SCIENTISM means that you'll swallow anything they give you because they say so, not because of authentic science. And when profits are involved authentic science goes out the window.

Countless people die nonstop due to scientism, in almost every facet of our lives.

You want proof? Look through /s/Radiation.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That sub is full of crap. Point me to a study from any university in the world - not just the US.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

My sub is not full of crap. Point me to any university in the world who's scientism is not bought and paid for by the corporatocracy. My uncle is professor of ichthology in Newfoundland and is exasperated at the state of things. Truth is for sale. Believe what you want.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

not bought and paid for by the corporatocracy

How about all private universities? They are paid for by the students.

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No, but a few hundred scientists have gone on record saying that 5G is dangerous. Scientists do not usually make wild, unsubstantiated claims because they often depend on the government for grants to continue their research. That should hold you for a while. The 60 GigaHertz band is particularly dangerous because it prevents the uptake of oxygen into red blood cells. Victims die because there is no oxygen to their brain and other organs. Those people you saw fall over suddenly in Wuhan had precisly that problem. No, it's not up to me to prove anything. It is up to the government and the companies that make the equipment, many of them chinese, to prove that their equipment is not designed to harm humans on purpose. In congrssional hearings the US company that makes some of the equipment admitted that zero studies had been done by them on 5G to show that it was not harmful to humans. You can see the congressional hearings on YouTube. Here is a good site to get information on 5G and its effects on humans: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBizESL5Wcvcxs2eB6h0txQ/videos

She shows parts of the congressional hearings and much more.

[–]danuker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No,

There you go.

a few hundred scientists have gone on record

Point me to a few.

60 GigaHertz band is particularly dangerous because it prevents the uptake of oxygen into red blood cells

had precisly that problem.

More unsubstantiated claims. Provide evidence or cease spreading bullshit.

No, it's not up to me to prove anything.

zero studies had been done on 5G

Yes it is. My belief is that non-ionizing radiation at telecommunication levels is not harmful. Same as the status quo's.

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hey, look it up yourself. Watch the video I linked. I am not responsible for your ignorance.

[–]danuker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

First of all, you edited your comment and added a CHANNEL, NOT A VIDEO, while I was replying. That is dishonest.

Second of all, you have not addressed any of my comments in the comment.