Just listening to a Netflix exec talking about what shows they want to be pitched. He literally listed "teen sex" specifically as a genre they want more of.

submitted by jet199 from self.Entertainment

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It won't be long before porn is so normalised in society that it becomes just a standard part of Netflix and Amazon. They'll be Netfux and Amascum for the masses of incels sat at home spanking the monkey.

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's already normalized. People have no shame saying they watch redtube. Birthrates are already below replacement. Birthcontrol is normal. One night stands are normal. Kids twerking is normal.

30 years ago (((they))) already created the belief in kids that if you are a virgin you are a loser.

Morality is explicitly targeted by Marxists as a method to subvert a target country. So is the nuclear family.

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not sure it's a bad thing to normalize, well, not porn exactly, but the human form as a byproduct. When the only place you could see tits was on a real life woman they got harassed a lot more over their tits in general. Now we have the World Wide Web of Free Boobies, all shapes, all sizes, free, and on demand.

[–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's a balance between prudishness and voyeurism.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You can be a prude or not be a prude and that's entirely separate from being a voyeur. Some women don't mind sharing their bodies openly and willingly.

[–]Alienhunter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You correctly point out the kind of unwelcome violation of privacy inherent in voyeurism, I'll fully admit a better choice of words is warranted.

I believe exhibitionism is the better term here. Though it plays into voyeurism as well as they are two sides of the same coin.

People will accuse the person saying "get a room" of being a prude, though that is far from the point, as a real prude would have an issue with them getting a room in the first place.

I'm not particularly bothered with the idea of teenagers messing around with each other. It happens. I am bothered by the idea of adults overly interfering with that, be it positive or negative interference.

Where that line is drawn will vary from society to society and from culture to culture. But the balance still exists. Modern US society has become almost wholly unbalanced to both extremes. Is sex for enjoyment or procreation, the answer to that question is it's for both, and if you lack either you're going to have issues down the line. There are subtle exceptions. But there is little reason to saddle teens with adult relationship baggage when a simple biological understanding of where babies come from is all which is necessary.