you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So it sounds like people are using their high value wealth storage wallet for day to day dumb stuff....That seems the equivalent of someone walking around with their retirement fund and life savings in their back pocket and then getting mugged.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's Seth Green so... I am not exactly shocked he wasn't being too careful.

That seems the equivalent of someone walking around with their retirement fund and life savings in their back pocket and then getting mugged.

He's worth $40 million, it'd be like dropping change for a regular person, an amount that will not be felt at all.

There are disturbing implications as Web3 seeks to basically keep your wallet integrated into the experience. God, paywalls are going to become insufferable, and they're going to try to force us to use this web 3 garbage... And who knows what simply clicking on the wrong site might cost...

Anywhos, I am really interested what you think about this, and the market in general considering today.

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I can't imagine pay-walls ever really working. People have tried so long. Once you get access, you copy the content and re-post it somewhere else. People have already been trying the paywall concept with crypto for articles and porn; I suspect it hasn't proven the greatest.

Having software that makes payments without interaction is super dangerous. That already means it is unencrypted and ready to be drained with the slightest exploit or malware. These sort of hot wallets should only have small amounts of funds in them, and only briefly.

While I can relate to concerns about how people might leverage crypto to monetize the web, I think innovation in doing so is a very good thing. The scourge of advertisers and their embedded role of personal data collectors is the worst and needs to end.

I've seen innovations like Brave Browser and their ideas with Basic Attention Token come along. I wasn't stoked about the idea of getting paid to opt-in to ads, but any innovation, especially optional ones seem good progress. I really liked their additional strategy of making it easy to tip websites, even setting up small automatic tips when you visit. This sort of voluntary payment I really like. Many sites I wish I could easily tip, especially when finding a particularly useful article.

I think many entire industries are fighting for ways to monetize their content and they should get paid somehow for it or good content will go away. New technology gives the ability to do this in new bad or good ways. I'm hoping good ways will prevail.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, both are based on Firefox. Mozilla's version of Firefox has a shit-ton of stuff that collects every website you visit, and even pings when you close a tab. Most popular browsers are pure spy apparatus (ie Firefox Chrome and more). Telemetry, malicious site blocking, SSL cert checking, account protection, and the such are just excuses to track you or leak your usage to parties that can. Open source forks of browsers are important to avoid this.

TorBrowser has been around quite awhile as a security enhanced fork of Firefox. Brave Browser is the same, but quite newer. All "new" security is subject to a long road of painfully being run though the ringer. I don't see why the DNS leak (of onion addresses) were being made, as it doesn't make sense to send addresses out to check, but it seems Brave Browser was made aware of it with their hack/bug bounty system and fixed it rather quickly. That seems the tail of how we expect bugs and security issues to be found and fixed now days.