you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Could you explain how they were more important in building support for the invasion?

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

1) They silenced the opposition Democrat Party.

2) They silenced the corporate media.

3) They silenced all official doubt, skepticism, questions, truth-seeking, investigations, reporting, etc. for complete complicity in the cover up of 9/11 and the new Global War Of Terror.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

None of that is particular to the anthrax attacks.

[–]BISH 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

9/11 put the US public on their heels, and the anthrax attacks were used as the uppercut which knocked out all opposing dissent.

They started 2 weeks after 9/11 and targeted the offices of two US senators who were dragging their feet about supporting the "Patriot Act".

The sucks were blamed on Muslim terrorists, but there was no evidence. Ultimately the FBI targeted a US scientist, who sued the the FBI for 7 million dollars in damages and won.

They later targeted another scientist who allegedly committed suicide, and they then closed the case.

The anthrax attacks was another Zionist terror operation.

They were also used as the pretext for the bio security state installation that was switched on during the plandemic

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)