Theory: Multiple choice tests are completely fucked up bullshit to derive "grades" from
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from (self.DownTheMemoryHole)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]BanditMcFuklebuck 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
I was with you until the last two sentences. What do you mean?
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
Objectivity is a non-word in my simulation. Because it doesn't exist (except inside mathematics itself, maybe... if one feels inclined to believe in all these axioms needed there).
It can be strived for though. But mostly not successfully "enough" by idiots. Exemplary for idiots are the sheeple developing these kind of tests mostly.
Because of that there are less and less people thoroughly thinking for themselves since money seemingly is also a time-question when developing these tests.
TL;DR: "We have not enough time to develop a test to take serious time on grading, so just let use this bullshit one".
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
A sub dedicated to the preservation of valuable information. Post your latest finds, tips, tricks, and favorite archives.
Sub endorsed archives:
How to:
See also:
view the rest of the comments →
[–]BanditMcFuklebuck 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)