Anything that refutes the authority and/or standard narrative is rejected as "fringe" or "fancruft" and is pushed to the fringe onto Wikia or elsewhere. I suspect there is good info on some Wikia channels (or whatever they're called) but I don't know how long it will remain uncensored if it ever was. WordPress and Patreon are censoring people too.

Wikipedia will often "cover" fringe topics but they'll utterly misrepresent them and or minimize them. If you want information on a CIA op you may find a stub article but no body counts, etc and it won't be very expansive despite it being profoundly important.

For example, compare the very core of the Vietnam War : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

To a good long all American article : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evel_Knievel

They use the excuse of brevity to cut it short so you're forced to look elsewhere for details. They also tend to split articles when it's not necessary, further impeding your ability to easily digest information.

I forget the exact dates, but it was definitely in October-November of 2016 that changed the Wikipedia bookmarks. If you bookmarked a Foo article or dragged your WP icon to your desktop or whatever it used to say, "Foo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" , but the removed the tail so now it's only, "Foo - Wikipedia" .

Part of the sinister aspect is how Wikipedia is rigged as bad as our elections. They have gangs of "administrators" and editors with rank, all likely shills. Meanwhile, you can't even organize, on or off Wikipedia to affect change. I learned the hard way trying to improve the very shitty "9/11 Truther Movement" article, not even the 9/11 nor 9/11 conspiracy articles. Further example of how they rig it, is how they'll say RT is legit sometimes and sometimes not. Or one "legit" source will tell the truth one or two times, but they'll need three verifiable citations for "fringe" content, thus keeping it fringe.

Further they have a Wikipediaese, like legalese, all with codes and shit to find you guilty no matter what.

InfoGalactic is mostly an outdated mirror copy of Wikipedia with some "forking" with alt-right revisions and new articles. Their front page is just the same things on rotation with alt-right news in the current events quarter. I can also put my progressive anarchy crypto truther stuff there, freely and without censorship. And I can do my own wiki projects beyond the encyclopedia stuff. Their "community" and communication skills are virtually non-existent. I have no idea how long it will last. Vox Day apparently owns it though I don't know if he's ever written a word on it. I'd love to revise several aspects of it towards neutral freedom.

The InfoGalactic PG stuff is open, free, and uncensored. Read it.

Please link me to information about Wikipedia being a Soros operation.