you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

There are a lot of Pizzagate sources. I signed up for the Pizzagate wiki but I wasn't allowed to edit it which makes me think the whole thing is a limited hangout psyop - part true and part lie - also fit for catching "freethinkers" like me.

Pizzagate is only a slice (pun intended) of the greater problem. For more read on...

https://infogalactic.com/info/Pedophocracy

https://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_acknowledged_pedophilia_elites

https://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_alleged_pedophilia_elites

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

pizzagate wiki? it was probably hosted by wikipedia which is a known soros backed entity.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Please tell me more about this Soros angle. I'm not saying it isn't true but this is the first I've heard of it. I've always known it was run by Jimmy Wales. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales ) I've always known that info on Wikipedia was generally good but not always. In 2015+ I started actually tried to correct stuff and learned the hard way about the back-end culture and guard dogs that got me banned for a year (2017).

No, it wasn't Wikipedia, or their sister projects, supposedly free but not. Nor was it Wikia, also owned by Jimmy Wales. It seemed like a legit indie wiki, using the MediaWiki software, same as WP etc. I set up my own wiki here at home. It's easy. But I never used it, in part because building the deep links is painstaking, and really the only reason to use a wiki over a normal text file document. Also, I broke it when I updated my XAMPP stack. I could fix it if I cared to. Making/Having a wiki is no big deal. (I really wish SaidIt would start their own deep truther's wiki.) Having users is.

Infogalactic, linked above, is mostly alt-right guys. I'm an anarcho-progressive Green truther who uses it freely uncensored. I like it because it's free AND they let me use the wiki for my non-encyclopedic projects.

For example, I just started this non-wiki project : https://infogalactic.com/info/User:JasonCarswell/Truther_Top_20s

And I'm working on this one, using the wiki as my base of operations for my open-source animated series of shorts production management : https://infogalactic.com/info/User:JasonCarswell/Trutherism_101

Also, FYI, while the Pizzagate Wiki seemed legit at first glance, I never did explore it fully, hoping to do so when allowed in after registering. I registered but wasn't allowed in. I've never been back since. I have no idea if it's still going and don't care too unless they open up to collaboration. It may be just as good or even better than all the other proprietary-closed Pizzagate websites out there. I don't visit them either.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

yea, about 25% percent of wikia/WP info is accurate at best, lol. There is a large amount of disinformation on wikipedia, lol.

while WP and its sister projects might seems good, it actually isnt. it was once said that any user could freely edit and add to WP's database, but since then, they rly locked it down on who could edit or add info. they might let you edit or add info as long as it goes with MSM/Soros backed narratives, but if its against what their pushin, expect the changes you made to be reverted.

infogalactic is more of a alt media/real news WP clone.

as for the PG stuff, the sjw's have it semi hjacked on site like voat and probably the wiki you mention too.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Anything that refutes the authority and/or standard narrative is rejected as "fringe" or "fancruft" and is pushed to the fringe onto Wikia or elsewhere. I suspect there is good info on some Wikia channels (or whatever they're called) but I don't know how long it will remain uncensored if it ever was. WordPress and Patreon are censoring people too.

Wikipedia will often "cover" fringe topics but they'll utterly misrepresent them and or minimize them. If you want information on a CIA op you may find a stub article but no body counts, etc and it won't be very expansive despite it being profoundly important.

For example, compare the very core of the Vietnam War : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

To a good long all American article : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evel_Knievel

They use the excuse of brevity to cut it short so you're forced to look elsewhere for details. They also tend to split articles when it's not necessary, further impeding your ability to easily digest information.

I forget the exact dates, but it was definitely in October-November of 2016 that changed the Wikipedia bookmarks. If you bookmarked a Foo article or dragged your WP icon to your desktop or whatever it used to say, "Foo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" , but the removed the tail so now it's only, "Foo - Wikipedia" .

Part of the sinister aspect is how Wikipedia is rigged as bad as our elections. They have gangs of "administrators" and editors with rank, all likely shills. Meanwhile, you can't even organize, on or off Wikipedia to affect change. I learned the hard way trying to improve the very shitty "9/11 Truther Movement" article, not even the 9/11 nor 9/11 conspiracy articles. Further example of how they rig it, is how they'll say RT is legit sometimes and sometimes not. Or one "legit" source will tell the truth one or two times, but they'll need three verifiable citations for "fringe" content, thus keeping it fringe.

Further they have a Wikipediaese, like legalese, all with codes and shit to find you guilty no matter what.

InfoGalactic is mostly an outdated mirror copy of Wikipedia with some "forking" with alt-right revisions and new articles. Their front page is just the same things on rotation with alt-right news in the current events quarter. I can also put my progressive anarchy crypto truther stuff there, freely and without censorship. And I can do my own wiki projects beyond the encyclopedia stuff. Their "community" and communication skills are virtually non-existent. I have no idea how long it will last. Vox Day apparently owns it though I don't know if he's ever written a word on it. I'd love to revise several aspects of it towards neutral freedom.

The InfoGalactic PG stuff is open, free, and uncensored. Read it.

Please link me to information about Wikipedia being a Soros operation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

i seen a thing on it a couple years back, i cant find it now sadly, prolly had it removed

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Okay. Thanks for trying. Might be worth dredging up somehow.

Also, you might consider widening from a Soros-Wikipedia connection to a OpenSociety-Wikipedia connection.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Foundations

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

yea, i'll have to look into that, WAC (WeAreChange) has done a video on goerge soros and what he backs and funds

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

/u/Broken-needles350/

If you find anything please ping me (as above) in case I miss it. Thanks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

will do :) your welcome :)