top 100 commentsshow all 116

[–]wuzizname 55 insightful - 8 fun55 insightful - 7 fun56 insightful - 8 fun -  (46 children)

Why is the world so stupid now? We’ve never had as high a percentage of highly educated people but the world is somehow become stupider.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Honestanonymous 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    And brainwashed by the media and their own parents and peer groups through social media. It's all toxic.

    [–]peety 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    <deleted>

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Is it a coincedence that tv, pc, and gaming is all ran by jews

    [–]peety 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    <deleted>

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]MrZak 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Something is definitely off between my generation and the next one, its like they've all been brainwashed, the men are weak willed and the women are self destructive, nobody seems to be actually contributing to society.

      Guys are so sensitive to jokes which have been commonplace for generations, its really weird.

      [–][deleted] 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Because education does not equate intelligence.

      [–]Ossidiana 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      We’ve never had as high a percentage of highly educated people

      Are you quite sure? Because I certainly didn't notice.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Believe it or not, we are actually far better off now than we ever used to be. People act less stupid than they have done for most of history. We might be coming off a peak of IQ high, though.

        This doesn't mean that we are not being stupid, just that we used to be even more stupid, in many regards. How unfair laws used to be, for example, can be seen in books like those of Ernest Belfort Bax: https://archive.org/details/fraudoffeminism00baxerich

        For example, husbands were responsible, in many instances, for many crimes committed by their wives. We still had slavery, prohibition of alcohol, we were sent to jail for the crimes of family members. That was the case both in Europe and is still the case in India in some instances, from what I understand, such as in dowry laws.

        Every generation has to contend with their own share of stupidity. In that sense, we are doing our part. But, I do not need people to agree with me, because if they feel we are now more stupid than we used to be, they will still try to improve society, which is all I want. No matter how stupid we are now or we were then, we should always strive to do better.

        Woodley, Michael A., Jan te Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy. “Were the Victorians Cleverer than Us? The Decline in General Intelligence Estimated from a Meta-Analysis of the Slowing of Simple Reaction Time.” Intelligence 41 (2013): 843–850.

        http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/woodley2013.pdf

        As for universities, they may have actually become more stupid, because there has probably been an inflation of degrees. Getting to your doctorate used to be a very high honor. Now, everybody seems to have a PhD. I also felt that in the modern university I attended things were actually easier than the very traditional high school I attended, were we still studied Latin and ancient Greek, were teachers were very tough and it was rare to get full score on an exam. Virtually nobody got 100% on a test. The best student would usually get an A but there would never be a student who wasn't pushed to do better. At university, the professors seemed kind of reserved and soft, had more aversion against upsetting students, were more likely to just give an A. It was strange. Something might very well have happened in education. I know that my parents were still beaten or physically disciplined at least (pulling on ears, whacking on the hands with rulers, etc.).

        But, as I said, it's probably better to err on the side of being too negative about the state of education than to be blissfully ignorant. If we are wrong about this, all we are doing is improving culture, society, and education by bringing more discipline into it again.

        As for the gender divide, we are also less hypocritical about it now. I think older generations just didn't think about it as much, so they intuitively did what aligned with male and female gender roles, they automatically gave males more authority in exchange for their burden of having to defend country and society. Now, as unfair as courts often seem against men, they often also pass judgment on women in ways that only few judges would have done in centuries past, were women could often get away with murder (there were barristers who argued that women should no longer be put on trial for certain crimes because juries just wouldn't convict women).

        I am not excusing any bigotry. We live in a different world now. We do not have tigers to fight anymore, we do not have rival tribes invading our villages. The threats of modern society are of a different kind that both genders should be expected to be equally well equipped to contend with, so it is time, in that regard, to make the genders more equal. But from other points of view we are also already a lot less unequal, a lot more educated, and a lot less silly. But, there are narrow areas, such as the transgenderism trend, where we do seem to have regressed, maybe temporarily as society, in its collective fashion, is figuring out how to deal with a new idea. I do think, though, that we will converge towards being sensible eventually.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        The best student would usually get an A but there would never be a student who wasn't pushed to do better.

        Good reminder of how a good social environment is supposed to work.

        [–]Honestanonymous 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        Because the level of distraction and decadence we have nowadays basically shuts our brain off. The average persons attention span is that of a pringle.

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Communists are deliberately lowering the Iq of their subjects

        [–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

        University nowadays is mostly about turning up and having your professors like you then colouring neatly in between the lines for your thesis which will never be read by anyone. Congratulations, you're now an unemployable graduate in 100k of debt

        [–]professional_incel 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        why are you a white knight cuck? are you that desperate for a whiff of pussy?

        [–][deleted]  (12 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Zahn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

          Sistercrap, is that you?

          [–][deleted]  (9 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Zahn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

            Why does it feel like you "enjoy" drinking...just a little bit?

            [–][deleted]  (7 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Zahn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

              Either way you act like you're the obnoxious loud drunk at the bar slurring and slobbering all over yourself.

              [–][deleted]  (5 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Zahn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                I want you to know that I really like all of your usernames. I think it takes a lot of creativity and intelligence to imagine such colorful monikers. I like to think you were inspired by all the porn you have to watch since you have such low self control, you can't help but touch your penis all the time.

                [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]Fleursdumal 37 insightful - 4 fun37 insightful - 3 fun38 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

                  It's crazy that we reached a level of wokeness so high it made a full circle back to hating homosexuality.

                  [–][deleted] 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

                  Strange how it is only Lesbianism and women that are targeted. The recent Reddit bans and people hating on feminists and women against trans ideology ie "fuck terfs" "kill terfs" "I punch terfs" tells me something is very wrong here.

                  [–]Trajan 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

                  I can see the headline now. Reddit censors subs that fall afoul of a shift in the left-wing identitarian orthodoxy. Women and lesbians most affected. This is of course ignoring what has been happening online for at least a decade.

                  Reddit has for a long time been banning subs, shadow banning, and threatening subs that went against the 'woke' narratives, including feminism. Subs I used to be in were forced to walk a very fine line to continue to exist. Nothing that could reasonably be described as hateful - just calling out left-wing identititarianism, predominantly feminist, attacks on things that offended the party. Twitter, YouTube, Patreon, and many others have been doing this - often encouraged or cheered-on by feminists.

                  That the woke zeitgeist has shifted to move women down the progressive stack was inevitable. The ideology is based on an oppressed/oppressor dichotomy, with the relative oppression of any given identity determining its place in the progressive stack. Turns out that men claiming to be women are more oppressed than women and lesbians, thus lesbians and women become oppressors when they complain about some weirdo swinging his dick at young girls in the changing room. I've little hope that the exiled feminists will see how their worldview led them to where they are now. They'll blame 'patriarchy' and will imagine this to be a plot by the same people who brought us man spreading and the apparent pilot to keep women out of tech, games, comics, and anything else to which men tend to gravitate more than women. The reality is that the people feminists have been attacking for a long time have been opposing this nonsense all the time. Feminists really need a 'are we the baddies' moment of realisation. Alternatively, continue along as you are. You'll either grow big enough to have yet another schism or will become a marginalised tiny group, loved by neither the mainstream left-wing identitarian movement nor those who oppose all of these neo-Marxist and hateful movements.

                  Welcome to the pit that feminism helped dig.

                  [–]Thunderpunch 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

                  What or who are "Truscum"? Who is oppressing that faction of transgenders? And why?

                  Heterosexual males posing (by wearing a costume) as women are not women. When they die, archaeologists will know their gender by their bones, let alone with their walking around twirling their respective dicks in front of themselves while alive. Some weedle their way into female-only women's prisons and then sexually assault the true females there.

                  There are very few examples of "extra" genders (being both male and female by nature, not a birth defect of having two sets of genitalia) in the animal kingdom. Humans aren't one of them.

                  [–]Trajan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                  What or who are "Truscum"? Who is oppressing that faction of transgenders? And why?

                  Truscum is the term invented by people who feel that gender dysphoria is not a requirement to be transgendered. People derisively known as 'transtrenders'. In my view they're low-effort trans and transparent attention whores. Most don't undergo any hormonal or surgical interventions, and they tend to grow out it when they get older. They treat gender as if it's an outfit they can change on a whim, with some of them claiming to change gender mid-conversation. I don't consider them to be transgendered. They would say that transgendered people are oppressing them by denying their 'fluidity'.

                  Heterosexual males posing (by wearing a costume) as women are not women. When they die, archaeologists will know their gender by their bones, let alone with their walking around twirling their respective dicks in front of themselves while alive. Some weedle their way into female-only women's prisons and then sexually assault the true females there.

                  You'll find a higher than average percentage are homosexual or bisexual. It's the same in other weirdo groups, like furries and otherkin. I totally agree - an inspection of their bones, or even their DNA, will reveal them to be male. You can't slap a Ferrari logo on a tractor and expect people will believe that it's a sports car.

                  There are very few examples of "extra" genders (being both male and female by nature, not a birth defect of having two sets of genitalia) in the animal kingdom. Humans aren't one of them

                  Yeah, humans are one of two genders. Anything beyond that is vanishingly rare and, as you noted, is a birth defect. It could be that being transgender has biological factors, as is the common understanding of homosexuality, but being linked to a biological aberration doesn't make somebody the other sex any more than biological factors of schizophrenia mean that somebody really is hearing the voice of God.

                  [–]Thunderpunch 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                  Truscum is the term invented by people who feel that gender dysphoria is not a requirement to be transgendered.

                  i.e. a term coined by hetero male-to-female trans identifying men.

                  People derisively known as 'transtrenders'. In my view they're low-effort trans and transparent attention whores. Most don't undergo any hormonal or surgical interventions, and they tend to grow out it when they get older. They treat gender as if it's an outfit they can change on a whim, with some of them claiming to change gender mid-conversation. I don't consider them to be transgendered. They would say that transgendered people are oppressing them by denying their 'fluidity'.

                  in other words, they're the ones who coined the term. They don't want to take hormones, or make any changes to their bodies.

                  Which was my point: transgenders who attack feminists (particularly females, as shown by none attacking or "girl"dick pic-ing John Cleese in his twitter feed.

                  https://twitter.com/JohnCleese/status/1281045745492246530

                  Unlike JK Rowling, who offered to make a coffee table book out of 'em.

                  You claimed in your previous reply that feminists dug the hole. But there is no hole, except the same old misogyny and men's rights people claiming victim-hood, males who claim they have a right to female-only spaces. What male has Polycystic ovary syndrome? And yet reddit shut down r/pcos forum, kicked out the actual female mods and installed trans-identifying men in their place as ned moderators. Men who don't have ovaries at all. The admins of reddit did that.

                  https://old.reddit.com/r/PCOS/comments/hmlhjc/rpcos_is_an_inclusive_community/

                  Every installed trans mod also mods other female-only spaces, including TWO X CHROMOSOMES!!!

                  But, yeah. Keep saying it's feminists who dug the hole, if any hole at all. It's the same old oppressive female hate-on males are taught is their right.

                  Turns out that men claiming to be women are more oppressed than women and lesbians, thus lesbians and women become oppressors when they complain about some weirdo swinging his dick at young girls in the changing room. I've little hope that the exiled feminists will see how their worldview led them to where they are now.

                  Males defending males. How original and never seen before in all of history. In fact, trans males complain about threats if they were to use a mens restroom... they never name where that threat is coming from.

                  It's other men who are a threat to them. Not women.

                  [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                  Brownshirts 1930: Let's persecute commies, democrats and everyone who doesn't suck up to NSDAP.

                  Brownshirts 1934: Aww, we are being persecuted by NSDAP. Strange how it is only Brownshirts that are targeted.

                  [–]Susiesmum[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

                  You're not being persecuted just because you're not allowed to join a social group that you don't belong in.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_association#:~:text=Freedom%20of%20association%20encompasses%20both,membership%20based%20on%20certain%20criteria.

                  [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  If you want to go that demagogic route then you are not persecuted by being banned from Wellington Pride. In fact that's the event ("Wellington is a wonderfully diverse city, and the festival program is a celebration of this diversity.") you don't belong in.

                  My comparison however was addressing radfems rabid misandry and hypocritical attempt of crying victimhood when they, in turn, have been thrown under the bus by their social justice buddies. And as always trying to paint themselves as the only victims. /u/Trajan pretty brilliantly put it in his first paragraph.

                  [–]Trajan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                  Thanks. Yeah, that's the pattern: claim victimhood and then bully people based on that. As one would expect with any identity-supremacist group, feminism by its nature must subvert anything it touches to make feminist issues the priority. The LGBT movement is a great example. Back before they added the T it was LGB. Prior to that it was GLB. Lesbians argued to be moved to the front on the basis that they are doubly oppressed by being homosexual as well as being women (i.e. intersectionality). This despite clear evidence that gay men had far more going against them both socially and legally.

                  That's one of many examples of feminism's role in the birth of intersectionality and also of feminism's need to impose its quasi-religious worldview onto anything it infests. One amusing development is that some transgender activists have taken to changing the ordering of the alphabet soup to TLGB. They're doing precisely what lesbians/feminists did back in the day, making it clear that lesbians are no longer at the top of the pile. Although a fringe movement, I expect this'll grow in popularity unless the transgender bubble bursts or some new and fashionable sexual/gender identity supplants it.

                  [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  The elite men want their male competition to be castrated and feminized

                  [–]Catbug 22 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

                  Wow so pride unless you’re a lesbian. Then it’s re-educate yourself and accept dicks you bigot.

                  Idk how lesbian women are meant to exist. Seems like everyone is more than happy to throw y’all under the bus and claim homisexuality is exclusively male.

                  [–]Overdrive 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  From what I've been reading, lesbians and lesbian groups have the least amount of funding. Transactivism has more money at hand than the gay and lesbian movements combined.

                  [–]LarrySwinger2 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

                  From the linked statement:

                  Festival directors Drew Hadwen and Karen Harris emailed us seemingly out of the blue rescinding our stall and invoice. They said that because they “welcome all people, groups and organisations who want to join with us to celebrate the amazing diversity and creativity in our LGBTIQ+ community” they can not have our lesbian feminist stall or “presence” at Out Wellington Inc. organised events.

                  We have written to Wellington City Council Mayor Justin Lester asking for a meeting to discuss whether he supports City Council funding going towards events that discriminate against lesbian groups.

                  It appears that they've been banned because their exclusivity is incompatible with the event's inclusive policy. And they're implying that, because others have discriminated against them (for being lesbian), their own discrimination against all males is justified.

                  [–]Susiesmum[S] 39 insightful - 1 fun39 insightful - 0 fun40 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

                  There is no such thing as a male lesbian. How can you include something that doesn't exist?

                  You're not being discriminated against by being excluded from a group you don't belong in.

                  [–]asterias 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  There is no such thing as a male lesbian.

                  When you are mentally disturbed, you can claim all kinds of things, including being a male lesbian.

                  [–]mexialian 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  You mean those things with beards wearing a dress are not lesbians? They’re not valid? Hahahahaha They’re a joke!!! I was on match and men would register as women to match up with a lesbian😒 It’s never ending!

                  [–]Jenstafarian 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                  all 'straight' men are actually male lesbians

                  [–]ChingChongdingdong 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

                  Unless they are from the Lesbos, then they are. Hahahaha.

                  [–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                  What does that have to do with it? You're framing it as if it's about whether or not transgendered people can be lesbian. But Out Wellington Inc. took issue with LRA not allowing men on their board. Why would men, or any non-lesbian people, for that matter, be unable to represent LRA or stand up for lesbian rights?

                  [–]yishengqingwa666 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  ONLY WOMEN CAN BE LESBIANS. Get it?

                  [–]Susiesmum[S] 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  Why would men, or any non-lesbian people, for that matter, be unable to represent LRA or stand up for lesbian rights?

                  You don't belong in every group you want to be in. I'm sorry that hurts your feelings but your opinion of lesbian exclusivity is irrelevant.

                  [–]Zodiac_Killer 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                  Anyone can be a lesbian. We're in clown world where anyone can be anything, bigot.

                  [–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  I was simply noting that this is why the LRA was banned from that event, at least as far as is clear from the linked articles themselves.

                  [–]yishengqingwa666 23 insightful - 3 fun23 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                  Males cannot be lesbians, so no. Lesbians are not "discriminating against all males". What a reach.

                  [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  It seems like cries of discrimination is all it takes for authortarian communists to shut down a group with the peoples consent.

                  [–]SillyMoneyGoose 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  The event’s policy isn’t that inclusive after all, if they exclude people, is it?

                  [–]teelo 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

                  And they say the Patriarchy isn't real!

                  [–]Trajan 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                  Good luck demonstrating an ideological connection to anything patriarchal. Oddly enough, patriarchal ideologies don’t tend to be big on men becoming women.

                  It’s somewhat easier to trace the lineage between intersectionality and feminism. In fact it’s incredibly easy. Barely an inconvenience.

                  [–]just_lesbian_things 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                  The patriarchy wants masculine men and feminine women because it fits into the patriarchy's narrative of male-female dynamics. Homosexuality and gender non-conformance is a challenge to "traditional" (patriarchal) values. The existence of men who do not want to oppress women and women who do not want to submit themselves to men is an aberration. This is why extremely patriarchal countries like Iran supports "gender transition" and "trans rights" for gay men.

                  [–]Trajan 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  That’s a good example, and you have identified an actually patriarchal society. How does an Iranian Islamic ruling explain men in wigs in the West being a patriarchal plot?

                  [–]Zodiac_Killer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  And they're correct.

                  [–]pixilight 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                  Fucking clown world

                  [–]filbs111 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                  The Ministry of Inclusion has spoken!

                  [–]professional_incel 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

                  I LOVE IT!! Those holes are getting a taste of their own medicine.

                  [–]liberty_primer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                  Radfem ideology is just a reaction to falling too law on the oppression olympics hierarchy.

                  [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]liberty_primer 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    Second wave feminism didn’t constantly focus on trannies. Almost all feminists were perfectly content white knighting for them until the media started shilling for trannies more than bio chicks.

                    Radfems are are just mad and butthurt that the elite ain’t on your side anymore. Serves you right for buying into the oppression olympics bullshit.

                    [–]professional_incel 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    what does that have to do with what i said?

                    [–]lyth 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    You are pathetic. Fitting username.

                    [–]Fictionsaur 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    TMW an attempt to being inclusive ends actually excluding an entire group.

                    [–]christnmusicreleases 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    What a clown show. LGBTQ find out who really controls the show.

                    [–]peety 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    <deleted>

                    [–]teelo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                    Whats with all the double posts?

                    [–]Susiesmum[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                    The troll's repeating himself because I'm ignoring him.

                    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                    [removed]

                      [–]TheKsist 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                      You're the reason reddit has downvotes.

                      [–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      We have a report button for this stuff.
                      "spam" or "drags down the discussion"

                      [–]sirdonkeykong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                      LETS MAKE A FORUM WHERE NO FAGS AND NO LESBOS ARE ALLOWED TO COME IN.

                      LETS MAKE IT IN A TREE HOUSE.

                      [–]Zahn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                      And again..

                      [–]avena_sativa_3 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      crosspost with s/clownworld

                      [–]Honestanonymous 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      Lol.....wow what a backwards racist and sexist culture they have created

                      [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                      Reminds me about the usual hysterical screeching when certain lawyers sue female-exclusive groups for discrimination and (oh, horror!) turns out Californian strict "equality" laws not always work one way only.

                      It's called getting a taste of your own medicine.

                      [–]Susiesmum[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      [–]SquirellEnthusiast 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                      This is from last year

                      [–]Susiesmum[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                      So?

                      [–]Zodiac_Killer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      HAHAHAHAHA!

                      [–]Exconduckducktor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                      I looked this up it was last year.