you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jagworms 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Look at it this way: despite its flaws, this film is far more truthful than all of the "science" we were told to follow, which all turned out to be bullshit.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I suspect that you're mistaken about that.

This film looks to be bullshit through and through.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

_I suspect that you're mistaken about that.

So now you want to be skeptical and think for yourself?

This film looks to be bullshit through and through.

Tastier than what you've been serving.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

So now you want to be skeptical and think for yourself?

I want to be skeptical and follow the evidence.

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

OK, did you look at the evidence skeptically, or swallow it whole? There is no convincing pro-vaccine data - it doesn't exist. But there's plenty of propaganda telling you to take it anyway. But now that the death and injury data is coming out, it would be foolish for anyone, of any age, to take the vaccine.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There is no convincing pro-vaccine data - it doesn't exist.

Vaccines save lives. There's no medical intervention that has saved more since antibiotics. The evidence isn't weak or in any way non-convincing.

But now that the death and injury data is coming out, it would be foolish for anyone, of any age, to take the vaccine.

Other way around.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Vaccines save lives. There's no medical intervention that has saved more since antibiotics. The evidence isn't weak or in any way non-convincing.

I'm calling your bluff. No vaccine that currently exists has been tested against inert placebo for safety. They assume the older one is safe, and compare the new one to it. That's not science, that's fuckery.

Your support of vaccines is not fact based, it's faith based. I don't want to continue to denigrate your religion, so please GTFO.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No vaccine that currently exists has been tested against inert placebo for safety.

That's ridiculous.

Here's one for the Oxford, AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine. The control was a placebo of saline.

Very many other vaccines and drugs would have similarly been tested against an inert placebo during phase 3 trials.

Your support of vaccines is not fact based, it's faith based.

Oh, the irony.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How safe did that one turn out to be? People are dropping like flies.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How safe did that one turn out to be?

Pretty good, afaict.

People are dropping like flies.

Maybe they didn't get the vaccine.