you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BISH 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Nope. This is really dumb.

Good luck finding any bullshit links to defend your foolish autopsy narrative.

It's a global cover-up beyond comprehension.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]BISH 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711979/

    You cite a 2017 NIH paper?

    The NIH is one of the perpetrators. Stupid.

    Like I said. Good luck.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    That is the NIH library, that paper is not authored by the NIH. Many of the papers showing the vaccines do not work can be found in that library. That particular paper is authored by the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology

    [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Back in 2017.

    The autopsies stopped early 2020, when everything was labeled a COVID death.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yeah I have no idea whether that is a good paper or not, just that being in the NIH library isn't necessarily evidence that it isn't

    [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The hyperlink I used was the same link socks used.

    NIH policy certainly changed in 2020, so using a NIH link from 2017 to prove their good behavior is meaningless.