you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I don't give a shit about the awards, I quoted the video description. Blame them, not the messenger.

Ha! I've never known you to accept you've made a mistake before, Jason. Congratulations on a small window into the world of rationality.

You probably should take more responsibility for quoting bullshit, but that's a relatively minor point.

Go fuck yourself - get a vaccination.

I've had many mate: Fully vaxed against COVID-19. From memory Influenza most of the last ten years. Polio. Yellow fever. Tetanus is getting old. Hepatitis B. Pertussis.

Which do you think I should get?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Ha! I've never known you to accept you've made a mistake before, Jason.

You don't know me very well then. I often admit mistakes. It's part of learning and growing. I'd rather be corrected than "right".

When are you going to learn and grow that you're believing in proven perpetual liars, that the MSM is ALWAYS lying, that the mafia government is ALWAYS lying, that big pharma is ALWAYS getting huuuge fines (small compared to their profits) for fucking people over. The authorities are NOT to be trusted - yet you promote their narratives of LIES.

You probably should take more responsibility for quoting bullshit, but that's a relatively minor point.

This is true, when it happens. I have been thinking about this, Actually. I post stuff I believe, stuff I question, and stuff I don't believe so that people can be aware that it's being said, so discussions can be had, and so that the truth or at least questions and details can come forth. I, like most folks, don't bother to explain that and SaidIt doesn't have a switch to indicate the veracity of the post, nor the opinions of the OP.

Now will you take responsibility for your bullshit? I have yet to see you actually admit errors, when usually you double down with more bullshit that serves your liar overlords.

Which do you think I should get?

You can never get enough COVID vaccinations since it's so safe and effective.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You don't know me very well then. I often admit mistakes. It's part of learning and growing. I'd rather be corrected than "right".

In my interactions with you in the past, when you're wrong, you start calling me "shill". In this case you said "go fuck yourself". Only in the following post did you confess "I quoted the video description."

When are you going to learn and grow that you're believing in proven perpetual liars

I don't believe everything I read. But some sources are much better than others. MSM are more often wrong than lying. The scholarly literature is much more reliable, but you have to be careful that our understanding is under constant review at the cutting edge, and there are predatory journals that publish a lot of bullshit, that can look exactly like a respectable peer reviewed journal to the amateur.

I have yet to see you actually admit errors

What error do you think I've made?

You can never get enough COVID vaccinations since it's so safe and effective.

I'll get a booster if the evidence shows that I should.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

In my interactions with you in the past, when you're wrong, you start calling me "shill".

Because I wasn't wrong.

You are siding with the liar media, liar authoritarians, and liar big pharma - and thus shilling for them, the enemy. Whether you do it for money or simply are brainwashed by their fear porn and propaganda, you believe them or are a sell out.

When you stop the lies I will stop. Chipit came around. You are not stupid. You can see the light too. You just have to be skeptical of those with power who are using it against all of us.

MSM are more often wrong than lying.

Bullshit. The MSM and scholars have endless well-funded resources to get it right if they want to. They are wrong ON PURPOSE with malevolent intentions - thus they aren't just wrong - they are LYING.

It's like the difference between an accidental death and murder by your hand - one has intention.

What error do you think I've made?

You still have way too much faith in their matrix of rigged systems.

I'll get a booster if the evidence shows that I should.

I wouldn't recommend it, not even to shilling liars like you (except in sarcasm). You can NEVER undo it. COUNTLESS people now have ENDLESS suffering and obvious regrets.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Because I wasn't wrong.

Yeah you were. Even this time it took you first said "go fuck yourself", and only later admitted the error, and only then by saying don't blame me, I was merely propagating wrong information I found on the internet.

The MSM and scholars have endless well-funded resources to get it right if they want to.

Not for investigative reporting. The business model is pretty much cheap content, then monetize by native advertising (Such as fox news it doing). Or lose money hand over fist. (such as the Guardian is doing) Or go for an elite market and charge like a wounded bull (such as the economist is doing).

What error do you think I've made?

You still have way too much faith in their matrix of rigged systems.

What specific error have I made in a comment that I didn't admit?

I wouldn't recommend it, not even to shilling liars like you (except in sarcasm). You can NEVER undo it. COUNTLESS people now have ENDLESS suffering and obvious regrets.

I'm a mathematician, don't try to pull stupid comments like this on me, it isn't going to fly. There aren't even countless people on the planet, so you're obviously wrong.

You think that people that live after a serious covid infection don't have lifelong effects?

You're wrong.

You think that the risk from vaccines are worse than the risk from Covid?

You're wrong.

Do you know those two things, or do we need to go through some case studies in the first case, or the numbers in the latter?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Go fuck yourself with your sealioning.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You accuse me of not admitting my errors.

Either let me know which one your fucking talking about or take back the accusation.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'll double down because you're all wrong, timesuck.

You can't even watch a video or read a book to see how wrong you are.

You are WILLFULLY IGNORANT.

Go fuck yourself with your sealioning.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You can't even watch a video or read a book to see how wrong you are.

I read scholarly papers. I haven't read books on the topics that come up here, but I have read books on climate change.

Videos are a poorer medium for finding the truth than the scholarly literature, because they don't tend to go through peer review, and because written terms and references are easier to find, as they can be cut and paste.

Go fuck yourself with your sealioning.

I take it this means you're accusing me of not admitting my errors without basis. And I should take this as a withdrawal of your accusation, as I had to take "Go fuck yourself professional nay-sayer of ill repute," as your admission of being wrong.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Most "scholarly" papers don't question the fundamentals and that's what you're lacking most. And you should know that many papers are sensationalist bullshit that is rarely retracted, as has been published in other scholarly papers.

Authority is a scam on all levels until they rigorously prove themselves worthy and legitimate rather than just claiming or taking it.

Have you read the scholarly books against the climate change hysteria scam and critical of the carbon tax that will only harm the global poor?

People can lie or be truthful or editorialize in any medium. Videos get reviewed in the comments. Yes, they will largely speak to their echo-chamber, but there will usually be critical opposition when warranted, unless censored. Depending on the source and content you can often find good critical insights there.

Yes there's a lot of shit in videos AND in print. Videos allow me to listen and peek (at 2x speed+) while doing other things. Ultimately the critical details and/or ultimate contextual understanding can be conveyed over any medium and your excuse is just more lame bullshit.

You can take my words and misinterpret them any fucking way you want. It doesn't make your conformist mental gymnastics correct.

I will not withdraw my statement of fact that you are a liar, a sealion, an authoritarian shill, and a supporter of the murderous big pharma corporatocracy that is bent on enslaving and depopulating the planet, with your fucking help.

Go fuck yourself with some pointy vaccines somewhere painful. Or better, just fucking get aware.