Some things don't change

submitted by useless_aether from (files.catbox.moe)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]happysmash27 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

This comparison seems a bit… dramatic :P .

Planned Parenthood doesn't necessarily focus on abortions as many people seem to think; from what I remember, they focus more on early preventative measures, like condoms. Regardless, to me they seem to support depopulation by definition, given that their primary focus (from what I am reading) is birth control.

Please correct me if I'm wrong about anything here; I don't know a great about Planned Parenthood, so this is based on a few articles I have read in the past and quick reading of their Wikipedia article.

[–]useless_aether[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

i think they make money off of fetal body parts, plasma, organs, stem cells, so with this profit incentive they can be viewed as a chop shop

[–]anescient 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

For accusations that serious you had better do more than "think" it's true.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/cmp/investigative-footage/

Watch the summary videos of specific undercover meetings from CMP’s Human Capital project documenting Planned Parenthood’s sale of baby body parts. Full footage for each encounter is also available.

https://illinoisfamily.org/life/no-more-tax-dollars-for-the-planned-parenthood-chop-shop/

Yes, federal lawmakers continue to fund what Daniel John Sobieski described in an op/ed as the Planned Parenthood “Chop Shop”–a business that is currently under investigation by the Department of Justice for “engaging in the illegal sale of aborted baby remains for profit.” According to Planned Parenthood, “the more fully-formed the baby body parts, the more valuable those parts are.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/03/funding_the_planned_parenthood_chop_shop.html

An analysis of the 2016-2017 report along with Planned Parenthood's previous reports shows that Planned Parenthood is responsible for the deaths of over 7.6 million human babies. We know the Planned Parenthood number is likely low, in fact, pro life journalists with the Media Research Center estimated in 2016 that Planned Parenthood had killed upwards of 7.5 million babies.

https://aclj.org/pro-life/how-planned-parenthoods-chop-shop-selling-murdered-babies-for-parts-pads-their-bottom-line

In addition to murdering thousands of babies, we now know Planned Parenthood is operating a chop-shop, selling murdered babies for parts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9EU_02c5bM

i still think they do. how about you?

[–]anescient 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Nah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_2015_undercover_videos_controversy

Officials in twelve states initiated investigations into claims made by the videos, but none found Planned Parenthood clinics to have sold tissue for profit as alleged by CMP and other anti-abortion groups. An investigation by the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee found no evidence of wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood.

https://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center

the annenbergs are part of the problem. pedofile enablers. this is a whitewash

[–]anescient 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Who gives a shit. The point is the facts: the selling dead babies thing has been checked out, it's already been through the courts.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

i do. and i am telling you again, look into the annenbergs.

[–]anescient 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The point is the facts: the selling dead babies thing has been checked out, it's already been through the courts.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

no, its still not over

In December 2016, Senator Chuck Grassley referred Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for investigation. In the fall of 2017, the FBI made a request to the Senate Judiciary Committee for access to un-redacted comments obtained from abortion providers.[131]

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

about the annenbergs behind factcheck.org

https://saidit.net/s/911truth/comments/jw5/noam_chomsky_2017_9_11_gatekeeper_and_intelectual/y6k

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They even make vaccines using the parts.

Being injected with other people's DNA material is far from safe.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Here's another side of PP if you're interested: https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/blog/margaret-sanger-quotes

https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/07/22/13-things-you-probably-dont-know-about-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

blackpilled globalists are the most dangerous

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's a great documentary to learn some interesting history about PP...

Black Genocide in 21st Century America - full documentary

There are plenty of sources to verify any of the claims. It's almost too crazy to believe, except that I was able to independently find reference material to verify each detail that I looked into.

My mind was blown...

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I don't disagree with their claimed reason-for-being, but the organisation itself is pretty shady. (It's the evolution of a rather different organisation.) I'm glad that my country has much less shady, biased and interest-conflicted analogous organisations.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

The difference in your country has greater ethnic homogeneity. Eugenics is a race war that is rebranded, so it can't easily be discussed or criticised..

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

No, it doesn't, actually. It's got greater ethnic diversity; at least double, by a back-of-the-envelope census calculation.

We have decent sex education; maybe it's that?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Let's confirm.

I'm in the US. What country are you claiming to be in/from?

Edit: wizzwizz4 loves the forum slide. Here's the TLDR: She's from GB.
87.1% white in the 2011 census..

It's a functionally homogenous society.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

The UK.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Are you going to stick to your claim that the UK has twice the ethnic diversity as the US?

Are you also claiming that Scottish, Irish, and English should be considered distinct ethnic groups?

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I know it's not the most reliable source, but it has a pie chart. Using religion as a rough indicator of culture (because more can agree on the metric than on ethnicity):

US religion (scroll down) (note that "Christian" is separated into three groups, and is massive. UK religion, however, provides a still-large "Christian" but about twice the number of other religions. Note that there are enough that it can actually name several and still have them visible on the pie chart.

But, to answer your facetious question, "Irish" is usually considered a different ethnic group to "English". And, more relevantly, the distribution of these groups is (anecdotally) a lot[vague] less polarised than in the US.

But, anyway, I think we've ruled out ethnic diversity as the reason for the discrepancy. Any other possible factors?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Nothing has been ruled out.

Your attempt to defend your argument is an absurdity.

Ethnicity has absolutely nothing at all to do with religion.

People can change their religion.

Ethnicity cannot be changed.

For example:

Jesus was Jewish.

Modern Israelis are typically Jewish from eastern european origins.

Jesus was not eastern european.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Sorry, Tom, I can't deal with this today. I could pick any statistic and you'd argue against it in this manner.

How am I supposed to show ethnic and cultural diversity – something that you can't really quantify – using the data from sources that we'd both consider unbiased (e.g. the census)?