Due to Health Concerns, Brussels Stops 5G Installation -- For Now

submitted by useless_aether from (activistpost.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zombi 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Again, please show me evidence of it. I have no problem agreeing with something that actually has proof.

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://takebackyourpower.net/brussels- Several studies are listed here with links.

Better if you do a search for < 5G danger > and you'll find a lot on it.

You may have a 5G router blinking on your desk but it has no connection to the 5G that can inflict pain and kill. The names are the same to confuse you. Also, ask yourself why Israel is NOT opting for 5G when it is being rolled out in the US, Europe, and Japan. For the record, I know that it means Fifth Generation but I was editorializing when I said "5 Genocide." On other social media there are shills who have a dog in this fight. They insist 5G is harmless while some scientists warn us it is not. Why has it been rolled out without any foreknowledge?

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So, the actual letter that that paper is based off of is actually calling for more testing to be done. The article itself makes it out like scientists are saying it is dangerous when they're saying (what I'm saying) that we don't know. The main risk seems to be that 5G implementation will result in chronic exposure to "Class 2B human carcinogens". Now that sounds scary, lets look up what that actually means:

The agent (mixture) is "possibly carcinogenic to humans". The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are possibly carcinogenic to humans.

Key word there, possibly. If we take a gander at the list of Class 2B Carcinogens, we find even more confusion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2B_carcinogens

Now we have things on this list that are pretty well known to be carcinogenic, like carbon nanotubes. Yet, after taking a closer look we find things such as Uracil mustard (which is ironically used in chemotherapy), Kava extract (a natural drink consumed by millions with seemingly no adverse effects), and our very own EMF field (cellphone frequencies such as 4G) which has been in use for decades. Huh, seems like this list is near meaningless and tells us literally nothing. Please, look at various items. Certain things are most definitely harmful, like DDT. Then there's stuff like Nickel and a chemical found in literally all plants. So if this list is used as proof of something being carcinogenic, then every single plant on earth is carcinogenic.

So what does this letter and by extension your article tell us? Exactly what I've been saying this entire time: We don't know.

Again, this is blatant fear mongering in my eyes. Go ahead and look into it yourself. All of these articles are speculation, which is what I'm trying to get across!

[–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The link I sent you has several studies linked inside. Since 5G was rolled out without any announcements there is good reason to be alarmed. The reason there have been no studies, is because the equipment was kept secret until it suddenly started appearing all over the country. If I am fear mongering then a lot of other people are doing it.