you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]filbs111 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

[–]JasonCarswellDAT Mod 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

You'd think they'd at least alphabetize their censored slurs so you could read their code easier.

(fag(g|got|tard)?\b|cock\s?sucker(s|ing)?|ni((g{2,}|q)+|[gq]{2,})[e3r]+(s|z)?|mudslime?s?|kikes?|\bspi(c|k)s?\b|\bchinks?|gooks?|bitch(es|ing|y)?|whor(es?|ing)|\btr(a|@)nn?(y|ies?)|\b(b|re|r)tard(ed)?s?)

Asshole is absent.
Bitch is censored.
Cocksucker is censored.
Cunt is absent.
Many other basics are absent.
I'm still certain shill, sealion, and liar are not name-calling.

What is mudslime?

Tyrannical n!ççér5 can never kill creative expressions.

So much effort could have been put into adding actually useful things (metatags, archival tools, etc).

[–]filbs111 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I wonder whether their ideology prohibits unit testing this.

[–]JasonCarswellDAT Mod 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The units who coded it surely tested it.

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

read their code easier.

Perl? Regex? DEFY!