Iraq was preemptively destroyed as a potential threat (based on lies). They preemptively isolate us as potential COVID carriers (based on lies). Soon enough they'll preemptively execute people as potentially treasonous or whatev. Maybe we should prepreemptively organize some effective rev/solutions?

submitted by JasonCarswell from activistpost.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ah, so cute! Going to go to the mob, see which one is more popular. Lovely. You must aspire to become a politician.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If you say so. The mob is not always correct. The leader is not always correct. No one is always correct.

That's why science is never settled. Even IF climate change was actually supported by 97% of climate scientists (which it isn't) there is still room for research and further exploration.

I'm confident that I'll have the majority on my side, assuming anyone bothers to notice that post. Doesn't make me 100% correct, but it might make you think and maybe someone can explain it better to you. Or on the chance I'm wrong, maybe I can learn something.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh you are definitely wrong.

The scientific NATURE of a discipline is not the same concept as the scientific PROCESS as it applies within a discipline, using its fixed and unalterable laws.

That you fail to grasp this is the entirety of the whole argument closed in my favor. /thread.